- By Amy Castor and David Gerard, for their sins
- Our work is funded by our Patreons — here’s Amy’s, and here’s David’s. Your monthly contributions help us greatly in steeling ourselves to dive into this jaw dropping foolishness!
Reality show queen Kim Kardashian is not stupid. She’s a billionaire businesswoman. She clearly has basic competence.
Kardashian is even studying law. She passed the first-year “baby bar” exam in December 2021, on her fourth attempt. (This isn’t unusual — the pass rate is around 21%.) [The Guardian; Elle]
But that doesn’t mean she understands securities laws — or that putting “#ad” on the end of an Instagram post promoting a security does not, in fact, leave you in the clear.
Section 17(b) of the Securities Act specifically states that you need to spell out how much you’re being compensated for a promotion — and Kardashian neglected that bit when she posted about EthereumMax (EMAX) to her 225 million Instagram followers on June 16, 2021.
How could Kardashian have known EthereumMax was a security? Paragraphs 6 to 9 of the SEC order against her detail how blatant EMAX was. Kardashian’s post even promoted a token burn that was supposedly “giving back” to the “community” — implying financial benefit. [SEC press release; Order, PDF]
The SEC came down hard on Kardashian. She has agreed to a $1 million fine, and disgorgement of the $250,000 she was paid plus $10,415.35 in prejudgment interest. Kardashian must not promote a “crypto asset security” in the next three years. She will also “continue to cooperate with the Commission’s investigation in this matter.”
We’re pretty sure Kardashian knows what a security is now.
Kardashian is currently launching a private equity firm, SKYY Partners. So she’d better be on top of this stuff. [Fortune]
EthereumMax is an ERC-20 token on the Ethereum blockchain. The promotion for EMAX promised all sorts of amazing visionary aspirations — but it’s just another worthless altcoin that doesn’t do anything. [CoinDesk; EthereumMax white paper, archive, PDF]
EMAX was launched in May 2021, only a month before the June 2021 celebrity push. Kardashian, boxer Floyd Mayweather, and former NBA player Paul Pierce hawked EMAX to their massive social media followings — though this didn’t halt the token’s ongoing price collapse.
Paid to pump
In September 2021, a few months after Kardashian’s EMAX post, Charles Randall, the head of the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority, gave a speech that called on online platforms to crack down on financial scams. He specifically noted Kardashian’s post: [FCA speech]
“Which brings me on to Kim Kardashian. When she was recently paid to ask her 250 million Instagram followers to speculate on crypto tokens by ’joining the Ethereum Max Community,’ it may have been the financial promotion with the single biggest audience reach in history.
The problem is much wider than Kardashian. Celebrity endorsements for financial toxic waste are an ongoing problem. Actor Ben McKenzie speaks up about it from time to time — including on the case of Kardashian — and suggests celebs stick to promoting non-trash: [Slate]
“To criticize celebrities shilling crypto isn’t to impugn them as people or to say that I’m above accepting an easy payday. (Call my agent, legit companies with not-scammy products!)”
Citing quotes from a “crypto marketing agency” executive, the Financial Times wrote this on celeb crypto promotions: [FT, archive]
“It’s considered easy money,” said an executive at a crypto marketing agency, who asked not to be named, adding that the endorsements are often pushed by talent agents who will offer deals that include posts by several of their high-profile clients, with price tags ranging from tens of thousands to millions of dollars. “You ain’t seen nothing yet.”
Fundamentally, Kardashian’s people failed to realize that the EthereumMax sponsorship would blow up on her. We expect a deeply displeased Kardashian sent more than a few heated texts to her minions along the lines of “what on earth?” — or however you phrase that in Kardashian.
We don’t know of any evidence that Kardashian cared about EthereumMax or knew anything about crypto in general. The only past involvement she had with crypto is that she apparently used some chips with bitcoin logos on them in a charity poker game in 2018. We doubt she cared about crypto then either. [Cointelegraph]
How about those NFT shills?
Celebrities have been hawking NFTs at top volume for the past year — such as Jimmy Fallon and Paris Hilton pumping bored apes on late-night television, and Madonna tweeting that she finally got her “very own ape” in March. (Madonna’s talent manager Guy Oseary represents Yuga Labs, the company behind the BAYC project. He is also an investor though his fund Sound Ventures.) [Mashable; Twitter]
Almost no celebs would understand the many NFT deals we saw them taking through 2021. Likely, their people would have just told them: “It’s a sponsorship for internet art, free money!” and they’d go “Sounds good, tell me when you need me to nod and smile.”
So far, NFTs are not securities. Mostly. Probably. But they’re still stupid investments best left entirely to the crypto speculators.
Celebrity NFT promotion would be under Federal Trade Commission rules — where disclosing that your promotion is an “#ad” is probably sufficient. Though almost no celebrity Bored Apes promoters did so, for instance.
Some of this stuff flies a bit close to the sun. When celebrities go on TV promoting Bored Apes NFTs, they’re not just promoting Bored Apes, but the entire ecosystem that Yuga Labs has created — including Apecoin, which is an obvious and blatant security offering.
It’s so unfair!
The SEC moved quicker on Kardashian than on many previous crypto-related violations. It only took a little over a year to charge Kardashian. The SEC hasn’t charged EthereumMax directly for not registering its offering.
Anyone who calls this “regulation by enforcement” is a clown. This is just enforcement. There’s absolutely no reasonable question of the facts or laws here. The SEC has been warning about this nonsense since 2017. [SEC, 2017]
Floyd Mayweather in particular already settled with the SEC in November 2018 for failing to disclose payment for promoting ICO tokens. That settlement barred Mayweather from accepting payment for promoting securities — and his EthereumMax promotion in June 2021 would have been within that period. We wonder if there’s an order coming his way too. [SEC press release, 2018; order, PDF, 2018]
Action against unregistered securities isn’t restricted to the SEC — private citizens can bring actions against unregistered offerings, and against their promoters. In January, a class action was brought against EthereumMax founders Steve Gentile, Giovanni Perone, and Justin French, and promoters Kardashian, Mayweather and Pierce, claiming investor losses on this alleged unregistered security. [Complaint, PDF; The Block]
Kardashian didn’t just fly too high — she set a course directly for the sun, and she got burnt. EMAX was blatantly an offering of securities, the SEC had given clear warning over the previous several years, and there are clear laws governing disclosures when you promote a security.
Why did she so blatantly just not follow the law? Because she was likely ill-advised, and crypto seemed like easy money.
But it is incredibly irresponsible — and that’s why it’s so reprehensible. You’re encouraging people to engage in risky investments, where they invariably lose money.
Kardashian is a billionaire — $1.26 million is a trivial fine for her. But this is excellent enforcement by the SEC, pour encourager les autres.
SEC chair Gary Gensler even made a nice video about celebrity endorsements! Securities TikTok awaits. [YouTube]
4 thoughts on “The SEC busts Kim Kardashian over EthereumMax, pour encourager les autres”
I’m glad the SEC fined her and agree with you that this will dull the appetite of most celebs to drink from the crypto fountain. But I’m disappointed that the creators of EthereumMax got no action taken against them. They hired Kim K. and there’s nothing here to stop it at the source. If a bank did this, they’d be in heaps of trouble, not just their paid spokesmodel.
There’s been no action against the Eth Max people yet… that doesn’t mean it’s not coming
Tried reading the EthMax white paper.
What a load of tosh. It’s such obvious marketing swill it’s beyond belief.
Ah well. Idiots and their money are at opposite poles.
Yes, it’s a load of tosh.