Tag: SBF

Tether and Northern Data. Part II: the partnership

  • By Amy Castor and David Gerard
  • If you like this post, please tell one other person. It really helps!
  • To encourage more posts, here’s Amy’s Patreon, and here’s David’s. For casual tips, here’s Amy’s Ko-Fi, and here’s David’s.

AI is the hottest thing in 2024. Nvidia GPU chips are in high demand and shortages are common, so many AI startups rent computation from cloud providers instead of buying their own chips. 

If you’re an AI cloud provider, you could stand to make a lot of money.

CoreWeave, once a little-known bitcoin miner, is now a $19 billion purported value unicorn that provides GPU access to AI startups. Other crypto miners, Hut8, Core Scientific, Hive, and Riot, are trying to tap into the AI gold rush by converting their data centers to AI. [FT, archive]

Northern Data also wants to get in on the gold rush, so it devised a cunning plan: pivot to AI and get rich in an IPO. 

But Nvidia won’t take diluted shares of company stock for its cards. So Northern Data needed a partner with lots of cash. They found one in Tether, everyone’s favorite stablecoin issuer.

And in Northern Data, Tether found … a banker of sorts.

We talked about the history of Northern Data in part I of our series. Here, we’ll discuss their partnership with Tether and plans to strike it rich in an IPO. In part III, we’ll dig into the lawsuit against Northern Data by its former directors. 

A perfect backer

Northern Data had a plan: pivot to “AI” and IPO for billions.  

But first, they needed Nvidia cards to grow their cloud computing business — and convince investors that their money-losing operation had profit potential if they spun it off.

If you believe their unaudited claims, Tether is sitting on piles of cash. They’ve been boasting about huge profits from interest earned on US Treasury holdings and market gains on bitcoin and gold. They claim to be so loaded up now that they’re looking for investments.

In June 2024, Tether said they planned to put $1 billion into investments over the next twelve months. In the last two years, they’ve invested $2 billion, with Northern Data as their single largest beneficiary. [Bloomberg, archive]

What is Tether getting in return? Northern Data wants to combine its cloud business and its data center business. If they can IPO the new entity, the stock could be worth multiples of the current value of the two divisions.

Tether also has the prospect of gaining access to the bank accounts of a publicly traded company with businesses in Europe and the US.  (Northern Data AG is listed on the Munich Stock Exchange.) 

Tether’s banking dilemma

Tether has 112 billion tethers (USDT) sloshing around in the crypto markets, allegedly backed 1:1 with US dollars and also with squirrels and confetti. But quite a bit is Treasury bills and things very close to actual cash.

US banks really, really hate Tether — they’re not happy with all the crime, money laundering, and sanctions evasion. Even if Tether has the cash they claim, they still have the problem of moving money to and from customers without banks freezing their accounts.

Tether was cut off from the US banking system in 2017. This has left Tether resorting to clown banks like Deltec and playing cat-and-mouse games to keep banking access. If Tether wants to stay afloat, they need to find ways to move large sums of money from parts of the world where they don’t need it to low money laundering risk countries, like the US, where they can more easily wire funds to other jurisdictions.

After a few years of problems (that lost them $850 million), Tether made very good friends with Sam Bankman-Fried, who founded crypto exchange FTX and its trading arm Alameda Research. Bankman-Fried and Tether formed a partnership that fueled a new bitcoin bubble. In 2021 alone, Tether printed $60 billion worth of tethers, pushing bitcoin to new all-time highs. FTX grew to become the third-largest crypto exchange in the world. 

Before it collapsed like a clown car, FTX  served as Tether’s main financial launderette. Alameda Research was one of Tether’s largest non-exchange customers. Between 2020 and 2022, Alameda received almost 40 billion tethers directly from Tether. [Bloomberg, archive]

“These guys were running a one-way USD to USDT bureau de change,” Jonathan Reiter (Data Finnovation) of ChainArgos told Bloomberg. 

FTX and Tether used the same money launderers and they all worked together to prop each other up. Their shared bank, Deltec, is also alleged to have falsified invoices on behalf of FTX and Alameda to other banks. 

FTX was functionally Tether’s banker. But in November 2022, FTX blew up. Tether needed something new.

Tether pivots to AI

Tether announced a “strategic investment” in Northern Data in September 2023 — in what turned out to be a convoluted capital raise. (Tether swears they didn’t dip into the alleged reserves for Tether, which would have been abusing customer money.) [Tether, archive]

In June 2023, Tether set up a subsidiary in Ireland, Damoon Designated Activity Company, and funded it with “the equivalent of 10,000 Nvidia H100 GPUs,” worth 400 million euros. The key word here is “equivalent,” so potentially neither GPUs nor actual money.

A few weeks later, Tether and Northern Data announced they had entered a formal agreement. Northern Data would buy Damoon and Tether would get Northern Data stock — valued at 400 million euros. Before the sale closed, Damoon would acquire the “equivalent” in Nvidia chips: [Press release]

The valuation of EUR 400 million for 100% of Damoon is equivalent to the purchase value of the associated hardware without any up-writing. In essence, on completion of the transaction, Northern Data will have acquired latest-generation GPU hardware for a value of EUR 400 million.

In November, Northern Data also secured a 575 million euros ($610 million) debt-financing facility from Tether — a line of credit — “to drive further investments across its three business lines.” The debt facility is unsecured and has a term until January 1, 2030, meaning Northern Data had six years to draw on the funds. [Press release]

We know little else about the terms of the loan. Does Northern Data even have to pay interest on this?

Northern Data completed its stock-for-stock acquisition of Damoon in January 2024, bringing Tether’s total exposure to Northern Data to 1.1 billion euros — or the “equivalent” of that. [Press release, archive, Bloomberg, archive]

In an interview with Benzinga, Northern Data CEO Aroosh Thillainathan explained the transaction: [Benzinga, 2023]

Through our acquisition of a company called Damoon, a special-purpose investment vehicle owned by crypto giant Tether, we have acquired 20 NVIDIA Pods, each with 512 H100 GPUs. The transaction has been done as a contribution in kind, in return for issuing new shares, at exactly the valuation that these pods would have cost us if we had bought them directly from NVIDIA. 

That is: yet again, Northern Data spun up the stock printer to buy a company.

Tether now owns 51% of Northern Data’s stock. So they now have majority control of a German-listed public company.

How the money, if any, flows 

We can’t find third-party evidence that Northern Data has acquired or installed the 10,240 GPUs that it says Damoon purchased. Press releases state that Northern Data now have the GPUs — but it’s utterly unclear how Tether, of all the companies, could have even paid for them.

We wondered how Tether got banking in Ireland when most banks hate Tether, and realized: well, maybe they didn’t. 

Let’s run a pure hypothetical on how you might buy GPUs without moving money.

Tether could have placed an order for Nvidia chips — without paying for them. Companies do this all of the time.

They would have just needed to show that Damoon was creditworthy. Tether would then negotiate the purchase, issue a purchase order to get in the queue for delivery, and then, before Nvidia delivered the chips, sell Damoon for diluted Northern Data stock. This would release Tether from needing to underwrite the purchase or take delivery.

In this scheme, no money has flowed from Tether or Northern Data to any account in Ireland or to Nvidia, but now Tether has $400 million in clean receivables in Ireland.

That is: Northern Data bought a company with no assets or operations other than an incoming Nvidia delivery. 

This is a scenario that could have happened. Certainly, third-party evidence could exist to the contrary.

Northern Data said in January that they now “own” 18,000 Nvidia H100 GPUs and had started deploying them in December. The move “strengthens Taiga Cloud’s position as Europe’s first and largest dedicated Generative AI Cloud Service Provider.” [Press release, archive]

It’s possible Northern Data actually do own 18,000 Nvidia GPUs! From somewhere. It would be a big deal for a public company to flat-out lie in a press release, especially a company that’s already had run-ins with BaFin.

But there’s good reason to doubt the GPUs were paid for using dollars from Tether.

Get rich quick

Now that Northern Data has acquired its AI chips — or at least the “equivalent” as part of a Tether subsidiary — they can move to the next phase of their plan. 

Northern Data wants to combine two of its divisions — its Taiga cloud computing division and its Ardent data center division — and list the resulting company on the Nasdaq in the first half of 2025. (A third business division, Peak, still focuses on bitcoin mining.) [Bloomberg, archive]

The hope is that an IPO in the current AI bubble will lure in enough suckers to pull in a massive pile of cash. The new company wants to IPO for $10 billion to $16 billion — even though Northern Data’s entire market cap is only $1.4 billion. 

The immediate beneficiaries will be Northern Data CEO Aroosh Thillainathan, the largest employee shareholder, and Tether, who now owns 51% of Northern Data.

Reuters columnist Yawen Chen says the IPO “sounds more like valuation voodoo than financial reality.” [Breaking Views, paywalled, archive]

I’m totally good for it, bro

It also could be that Tether really do need the cash — if there were some sort of issues with the heaps of money they claim to have.

If Tether have $112 billion backing their USDT, they could make literally billions in the current high interest rate environment just from Treasury notes and similar. They don’t need to make risky investments.

So why is Tether even making these investments?

In “Lying for Money,” Dan Davies describes how financial frauds tend to grow exponentially over time as the gap between real dollars and fake dollars in the system widens. That’s because compound interest is the enemy of fraud.

In a legitimate business, money increases, gets invested back into the business, and grows over time. In a fraudulent business, that process works in reverse:

The reason for this is that unlike a genuine business, a fraud does not generate enough real returns to support itself, particularly as money is extracted by the criminal. Because of this, at every date when repayment is expected, the fraudster has to make the choice whether to shut the fraud down and try to make an escape, or to increase its size; more and more money has to be defrauded in order to keep the scheme going as time progresses.

Riding a spiral of fraud is a tempting explanation for Tether’s rapid growth, especially since 2020 when Tether put the tether printer into overdrive. 

Fraudsters also often turn to get-rich-quick schemes in the hope that they can miraculously dig themselves out of their ever-deepening money pit.

So we suspect Tether is short on actual cash dollars. They think they can turn $1 billion into $10 billion by entering a deal with cash-strapped Northern Data.

And when Tether needs to move dollars around, despite their limited access to proper banking, they’ll have their very good friends at Northern Data to help them.

We see an interesting future for Northern Data and its CEO Aroosh Thillainathan. We’re just not sure what that will look like.

Image: “A rendering provided Wednesday, March 9, 2022, by technology company Northern Data, MidAmerica Industrial Park, Grand River Dam Authority and the Oklahoma Commerce Department shows plans for Northern Data’s planned data center and North American operations headquarters at the industrial park in Pryor, Okla.” [KTUL]

Read more:
Tether and Northern Data. Part III: the whistleblowers

Posted on by Amy Castor 0

Crypto collapse: SEC brings regulatory clarity to Kraken and Celsius, stablecoins for the UK, crypto money laundering

  • By Amy Castor and David Gerard

Most of the deliberation time was spent saying “Wow, that was a lot of crime” “Just so much crime” “Maybe too much crime”

— Allistair Hutton

Regulatory clarity for Kraken

The crypto industry demands regulatory clarity! So the SEC keeps stating the regulations as clearly as it possibly can. Isn’t that nice of them? On November 20, the SEC sued the Kraken crypto exchange.

The causes of action are very similar to those against Coinbase and Bittrex. Kraken deals in crypto securities and acts as an exchange, a broker, a dealer, and a clearing agency, all in the same company and without the proper registrations for each. The particular crypto securities in this case are ADA, ALGO, ATOM, FIL, FLOW, ICP, MANA, MATIC, NEAR, OMG, and SOL.

The SEC also alleges Kraken commingled customer assets with its operating accounts. Kraken’s own auditors said this created “a significant risk of loss” to customers and led to “material errors to Kraken’s financial statements for 2020 and 2021.”

The message the SEC is sending in this series of cases is that it just isn’t going to put up with crypto exchanges doing all the securities jobs in one company anymore, and they need to stop. [SEC press release; complaint, PDF]

The Financial Stability Board, which monitors the global financial system, thinks what the SEC is doing is very good and cool. Its new report “The Financial Stability Implications of Multifunction Crypto-asset Intermediaries” sets out precisely how and why crypto exchanges combining all these functions (an exchange, a broker, a dealer, and a clearing agency) “can exacerbate structural vulnerabilities in those markets.” It uses precisely what happened in the crypto collapse as its example. Risk to the actual economy is limited, says the FSB — though the biggest issue is how the exchanges wrecked the few banks willing to talk to them. [Press release; cover sheet; report, PDF]

It’s not just the SEC cracking down on crypto. The US government is generally sick of crypto nonsense and looking to shut it down. This is what we’ve spent the past year and a half advocating for as loudly as we possibly could.

IOSCO, the International Organization of Securities Commissions, released its final policy recommendations to securities regulators on crypto. In short: regulate the heck out of this stuff for what it clearly is — and don’t accept handwaving about technology. IOSCO will release a second part on DeFi before the end of 2023. [Press release; recommendations, PDF]

SEC trashes Celsius bankruptcy plan 

Judge Martin Glenn approved the Celsius NewCo plan on November 9, giving creditors fresh hope that all the nonsense they’d been trudging through since July 2022, when Celsius initially filed for Chapter 11, was finally coming to an end. But it was not to be. 

The original plan was that NewCo would be managed by Fahrenheit LLC, which won the bidding for Celsius’ assets in May. This business would focus on bitcoin mining and ether staking. [Doc 3972, PDF] 

Creditors would get shares in NewCo, which would trade on NASDAQ. NewCo could issue shares without registration — under an exemption in the bankruptcy code that would allow it to do the initial issuance without filing an S-1 form with the SEC. Creditors would also get back $2 billion in crypto in January 2024. 

But within hours of the court approving the deal, it fell afoul of the SEC — who would not approve the staking and lending portion of the business. [CoinDesk]

The SEC also wanted more details on the company’s assets and accounts for the “predecessor entity,” i.e., Celsius Networks. Unfortunately, Celsius’ pre-bankruptcy accounts are comical trash, somewhat documented in QuickBooks and some Google spreadsheets. This wasn’t quite good enough. [Doc 4050, PDF]

Celsius is now pivoting to “MiningCo,” a mining-only company with US Bitcoin as the manager and a board of directors. Fahrenheit members will not be part of the new entity.

Celsius’ lawyers argue that the “toggle” to mining-only is just fine, and they had this in their back pocket the entire time. Judge Glenn is not convinced: “This is not the deal that creditors voted on,” he said in a November 30 hearing. Celsius may have to seek a new creditor vote to get approval on the revised plan, putting them right back in the mud again. [Reuters, archive]

Blockchain Recovery Consortium (BRIC), who had been selected as a backup bidder in May if the Fahrenheit plan fell through, argued that Celsius should have gone with its backup bid, rather than pushing forward with this stripped-down “MiningCo” plan. 

A hearing on this mess will take place on December 21.

If the MiningCo plan is not approved, Celsius may be forced to liquidate in Chapter 7.

If this new plan does go through, creditors should count the cash and liquid cryptos they get in the settlement as their actual return — and treat their MiningCo shares as lottery tickets.

My beautiful launderette

Spain has arrested Alejandro Cao de Benós, a long-time Western agent of North Korea and founder of the Korean Friendship Association, on behalf of the US, for working with Virgil Griffith. [Reuters] 

Cao de Benós was indicted in April 2022, along with Christopher Emms, a UK citizen, for signing up Griffith to travel to North Korea in April 2019 to give a talk on crypto at the Pyongyang Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Conference, which the pair organized. Emms, a crypto entrepreneur, is still at large. [DOJ; FBI; FBI] 

We’re guessing the US wants a long discussion with Cao de Benós concerning all of North Korea’s other money laundering as well.

The US is currently working to extradite Cao de Benós from Spain, a process that can take months.

In the US, FinCEN wants to declare crypto mixing to be primarily about money laundering, for no better reason than money laundering is precisely what crypto mixing is primarily about. [FinCEN; Federal Register]

Court to Coin Center over their spirited defense of Tornado Cash: LOL, go away. [Doc 74, PDF]

Following “requests from its wealthy customers,” Ferrari is looking to sell cars to sanctioned Russians (ahem) unspecified entities in a currency-substitute that they have to hand. [Reuters, archive]

Now that’s effective altruism

Sam Bankman-Fried is in a cell, where he belongs. [DOJ statement]

But there was much more to FTX than one crook — or five crooks if you count the guilty pleas of Sam’s former fellow executives. The use case for crypto is crime, and FTX was a money laundering machine. Jacob Silverman and Molly White discuss Sam’s many, many as-yet-unindicted co-conspirators. [The Nation; Molly White]

If you ever need a moment of cheer in your life, imagine how Alex Mashinsky, the criminally charged founder and former CEO of Celsius Network, feels seeing Sam be sent to jail in less than five hours. (The amount of time jurors deliberated.) Mashinsy’s trial is scheduled for September 2024.

Over in the FTX bankruptcy, John Jay Ray is suing the Bybit exchange to recover $953 million. Bybit had a private line into FTX and successfully withdrew $327 million in the run on the exchange just before FTX declared bankruptcy in November 2022. [Complaint, PDF]

Stablecoins for the UK

The more foolishly ambitious parts of the UK government are still talking up crypto. So the Financial Conduct Authority has a new discussion paper on fiat-backed stablecoins for “consumers who wish to pay for their everyday shopping with stablecoins” — a category that does not presently exist. [Discussion paper, PDF]

So far, the plan is to allow UK-issued asset-backed “regulated stablecoins” supervised by the FCA. Overseas-issued “approved stablecoins,” with a UK “payment arranger” taking local responsibility, will come later.

The FCA will be requiring consumer protections, consumer right of redemption, protections in case an issuer fails, coin value stability despite market conditions, and ways to “mitigate the risks and harms that we have observed in the market, and those that arise from existing business practices” — i.e., all the crime.

Anti-money-laundering requirements will apply only on redemption — not on every transaction.

This initiative is not about our friends at Tether or USDC — though the FCA uses them as cautionary tales, particularly with USDC breaking its peg when Silicon Valley Bank went down.

Instead, the FCA seems to be setting a path for non-banks to issue their own asset-backed pounds — a regulated form of wildcat banking, with crypto as the excuse to even contemplate doing this weird thing. Or a privatized CBDC, if you want to be generous. The listed examples don’t even really need a blockchain.

There is nothing a regulated GBP stablecoin would do for ordinary UK consumers that they can’t already do with debit cards. But the FCA says that prospective issuers are already in the wings. Our psychic powers suggest these may be Conservative Party donors, given the present government’s recent track record of blatant kleptocracy.

CoinDesk spoke to Matthew Long, the FCA’s director of payments and digital assets, who confirmed that their intent is not to let rubbish through: “We’ve seen lots of things that we’re really concerned about and at the end of the day, the person this actually affects is the customer.” [CoinDesk]

Submit comments by January 22, 2024.

Bitfinex suffers hardly any data leakage to speak of

The Bitfinex crypto exchange apparently suffered a completely trivial wafer-thin leak of almost no customer information at all sometime in October. They announced this complete non-news at 21:30 UTC on Saturday November 4. [Bitfinex, archive]

How bad do you think Bitfinex’s customer data spill was? Clearly so very insignificant — a mere trifle! — that they couldn’t get away with just saying nothing at all to the very large and important customers with short tempers.

We’re sure it’s fine. “Bitfinex has a very close relationship with law enforcement,” and maybe it’ll get much closer.

More good news for bitcoin

CoinDesk has been sold in an all-cash deal to Bullish, the crypto exchange backed by Peter Thiel via Block.One — and not to the Vessenes consortium that was sniffing around the site in August. Terms were not disclosed. CoinDesk will operate as a totally independent entity, for sure! Bullish says it will inject lots of capital. [Press release; WSJ, archive]

Binance is finally killing its BUSD stablecoin as of December 15, 2023. The remaining BUSD balances will be converted to the totally trustworthy stablecoin FDUSD on December 31. You can redeem BUSD directly at Paxos up to February 2024 — if you can pass their anti-money laundering. [Binance, archive]

Binance had previously been trying to switch to Justin Sun’s TrueUSD. But TrueUSD was having problems in July 2023 — such as billions of pseudo-dollars being minted out of thin air. It turns out TrueUSD was hacked. The company waited a month to announce the hack, giving themselves plenty of time to furiously mint more TUSD tokens and send them to Huobi. [Twitter, archive; Twitter, archive; Protos]

Bankrupt crypto lender BlockFi is winding down at last. Payouts will be between 39.4% and 100%! … so, 39.4%. [Reuters, archive] 

Circle, the company behind the USDC stablecoin, reportedly wants to try going public again in 2024. Circle tried in 2021 to go public through a SPAC offering. But they failed to get SEC approval for the proposed merger with Concord Acquisition, and by early 2023 they had given up. [Bloomberg, archive; WSJ, paywalled]

OpenSea is laying off 50% of its staff, as all the air has been let out of the NFT balloon. When it laid off 20% of its employees last year, around 230 people remained. So now they’re down to about 100 employees. [Twitter, Nitter] 

The trial of crypto trader and alleged exploiter of Mango Markets Avi Eisenberg has been delayed until April 8, 2024. Eisenberg’s lawyers say they need additional time to prepare for the case. He is currently residing at MDC Brooklyn, also the temporary home of Sam Bankman-Fried. [CoinDesk]

Alex de Vries (Digiconomist) has a new report out on bitcoin’s water usage. Each transaction on the bitcoin blockchain uses 16,000 liters of water on average, about 6.2 million times more than a credit card swipe — and enough to fill a backyard swimming pool. [Cell]

We also suggested that someone should become the Digiconomist of AI power usage. It turns out that guy is Digiconomist! De Vries’ article “The growing energy footprint of artificial intelligence” was published in Joule in October. [Joule]

When you buy a nice house, make sure the previous owner wasn’t a crypto Ponzi scammer. Basketball player Shai Gilgeous-Alexander bought a house in Toronto previously owned by Aiden Pleterski, the guy who was kidnapped and tortured over three days by an extremely upset investor inquiring as to where his funds had gotten to. Further aggrieved investors are still showing up at the house — and so Gilgeous-Alexander wants to reverse the sale. [NYT, archive]

Image: Kraken founder Jesse Powell in a random tie he found out on a road somewhere.

Posted on by Amy Castor 2

Crypto collapse: Bankman-Fried trial draws to a close, SafeMoon arrested, fourth US bank failure was crypto

A new crypto collapse update is out! This one is on David’s blog. [David Gerard]

Sam’s trial is wrapping up. He took the stand, a terrible move, and predictably, prosecutors ate him alive. Now the jurors will decide on his guilt or innocence.

Elsewhere in crypto, Tether is making loans again, Celsius creditors still getting soaked, the proper regulator for crypto is the DOJ, and Twitter is going down the toilet.

Posted on by Amy Castor 0

The beautiful mind of Sam Bankman-Fried

Here’s our latest, just before Sam gets up to destroy his life even further. He is testifying in his own defense in his criminal trial today, something his lawyers have likely strongly advised against. But Sam just can’t shut up. What makes him so reckless? Join us, as we take a deep look inside the mind of Sam and uncover what makes him tick. This one is on David’s blog. [David Gerard]

Posted on by Amy Castor 0

FTX: John Jay Ray files second interim report, sues Daniel Friedberg

  • By Amy Castor and David Gerard

Me: [turning to guy at gas station] so the polycule was mostly in the dark about the fraud. SBF had back door access
Guy: [pulling out taser from under seat] is that right

— Ed Zitron

“Attorney-1” was a bad boy

John Jay Ray III, the CEO of FTX in bankruptcy, has released a second interim report detailing how FTX skirted bank secrecy laws and commingled funds — and how an FTX lawyer, “Attorney-1,” served as Sam Bankman-Fried’s fix-it and hatchet man. [Report, PDF]

(We covered the first interim report, which came out in April, here.)  

“Attorney-1” is very obviously Daniel Friedberg, who was FTX’s compliance officer and Alameda’s general counsel. A day after Ray released the interim report, FTX filed suit against Friedberg, alleging malfeasance in the course of his duties. The complaint details many of the same incidents in the report. [WSJ; redacted complaint, PDF]

In 2008, Friedberg was a colleague of Stuart Hoegner at Ultimate Bet, where the pair helped cover up a multi-million-dollar scandal in which the site cheated its players. Hoegner now works for Tether, a dubious stablecoin issuer. 

SBF hiring Friedberg should have been the first clue that FTX.com was a massive fraud. 

Friedberg resigned around the time the FTX Group filed for bankruptcy. Weeks later, he met with the FBI, the DOJ, and the SEC and told them he wanted to cooperate with any investigations.

There’s an interesting line in the interim report:

The Debtors have identified on Attorney-1’s hard drive a final copy of the false written testimony that Bankman-Fried provided to Congress.

FTX has access to the hard drive from Friedberg’s computer. Did Friedberg just leave the evidence behind when he quit FTX? Or did he willingly hand over his laptop to FBI agents? This hard drive seems to have had all sorts of interesting documents on it.

Friedberg hasn’t been charged with any crimes as yet — but based on Ray’s report and the ensuing lawsuit, we wouldn’t be surprised if there’s a sealed indictment out there waiting for him.

Following the money

FTX owes $8.7 billion in customer funds — over $6.4 billion of which is cash and stablecoins. According to Ray, Friedberg lent a helping hand when FTX executives “used commingled customer and corporate funds for speculative trading, venture investments, and the purchase of luxury properties, as well as for political and other donations designed to enhance their own power and influence.”

Ray details what he found about various FTX accounts and the flows of cash in and out of them. Tracking money flows was “extraordinarily challenging”:

… from the inception of the FTX.com exchange, the FTX Group commingled customer deposits and corporate funds, and misused them with abandon … Commingling and misuse occurred at their direction, and by their design.

Ray and his team have recovered $7 billion in “liquid assets” so far, which is astounding — though we’re not sure how liquid the crypto component of that will be in practice, or how much is unsaleable FTT tokens.

The report does not include FTX in Japan, Cyprus, or Singapore — areas where funds were properly segregated by law. It also does not address FTX.US, which Ray says is still under investigation. 

No, no, it’s research 

FTX lied to banks — a lot. Alameda Research had “research” in its name so that it could get bank accounts without immediately being flagged for enhanced due diligence as a money services business. FTX couldn’t get banking, so they used Alameda bank accounts to receive customer cash, right from the start. 

But banks started asking inconvenient questions. When “Bank-1” — likely either Signature or Silvergate — asked why FTX was sending money to Alameda, an Alameda employee told them that “customers occasionally confuse FTX and Alameda” but that all wires through the account were to settle trades with Alameda.

This was false. In just 2020, one of Alameda’s accounts received more than $250 million in deposits from FTX customers and more than $4 billion from other Alameda accounts that were funded in part by customer deposits, says the report.

When banks started rejecting wires to Alameda accounts, FTX set up North Dimension so it could continue to funnel money to FTX. Friedberg and SBF told “Bank-1” that North Dimension was a crypto trading firm with substantial operations. In fact, it was an empty shell with no employees or operations.

Friedberg also engaged his old law firm to create a fake corporate register for North Dimension for the bank: “Specifically, after Bank-1 asked for a copy of the register, Attorney-1 directed a law firm to create a register.”

Time travel by document

In 2021, FTX Trading Ltd was planning to go public. As part of the paperwork for that, it needed an audited financial statement.

The problem was that from April 2019 when FTX.com first launched until the end of August 2020, FTX.com customers had been sending cash deposits to Alameda bank accounts. FTX needed to cover up the fact that they were just using Alameda to move customer and company funds around without any agreement to do so.

So in January 2021, Friedberg had his old law firm draft a “cash management agreement” to explain why Alameda held FTX cash. Friedberg created from this a fake “Payment Agent Agreement.”

FTX usually signed documents with DocuSign to provide an electronic record. In this case, to avoid a DocuSign timestamp, SBF wet-signed the document on behalf of Alameda and FTX on April 16, 2021 — backdated to 2019 “for the sole purpose of providing it to an external auditor.”

How did Ray’s team know the document was backdated? They found the original document file on Friedberg’s hard drive:

While metadata reflects that Attorney-1 created the Payment Agent Agreement on April 12, 2021, and that the executed version was last modified on April 16, 2021, the agreement purports to have an “Effective Date” of June 1, 2019 —nearly two years earlier.

The IPO never happened — but the fake document did help the FTX companies get more funding from “potential investors in connection with its $400 million Series C financing that closed in January 2022.”

Sam the philanthropist

SBF was famous for his Effective Altruism. He used FTX funds by preference:

The Debtors have been able to identify certain transactions that appear clearly to have been funded in part with commingled customer deposits. These include political and “charitable” donations, venture investments and acquisitions, and the purchase of luxury real estate for senior FTX Group employees in the Bahamas.

Sam’s charitable donations got a bit esoteric. The FTX Foundation gave one guy $300,000 to “Write a book about how to figure out what humans’ utility function is” — a question that LessWrong rationalist philosophy needs to answer so as to construct the perfect superintelligence to rule over us all. And that hopefully won’t turn out to be Roko’s basilisk. [LessWrong, PDF, 2004]

The Foundation gave someone else $400,000 to make YouTube videos to promote LessWrong rationalism and Effective Altruism.

Closer to home, the Foundation gave $20 million to the Guarding Against Pandemics PAC, which was run by Sam’s younger brother Gabe Bankman-Fried.

FTX sues Friedberg

Friedberg’s malfeasance was egregious enough that FTX  is suing him for “damages caused by breaches of fiduciary duties, legal malpractice, and other wrongdoing, and to recover fraudulent transfers.” 

The suit also alleges Friedberg paid off whistleblowers rather than deal with the compliance issues they raised.

Friedberg worked at FTX from 2017 until its collapse in 2022, the last 22 months of that as general counsel at Alameda and chief compliance officer at FTX. Joe Bankman, SBF’s father, pushed Sam to hire Friedberg and keep him “in the loop … so we have one person on top of everything.”

FTX paid Friedberg millions of dollars in salary and bonuses, and tens of millions in crypto — a $300,000 salary at FTX.US, a $1.4 million signing bonus, an 8% equity stake in FTX.US, and a $3 million payment from Alameda. 

Plaintiffs want compensatory damages to be determined at trial, disgorgement of all of Friedberg’s compensation including the cryptos, punitive damages, and attorney’s fees.

Chief noncompliance officer

Friedberg’s putative job as chief compliance officer was to make sure the proper checks and balances were in place to prevent fraud, commingling of funds, and other wrongdoings. Per the complaint, he didn’t do any of that. Instead, “Friedberg actively participated in and facilitated such misconduct.”

Money was funneled to FTX insiders and booked as “personal loans” — which were never repaid, and which there was never any serious discussion of paying — “despite Friedberg’s false statement to the outside accountants that interest was paid quarterly on the loans.”  Friedberg was involved in more than $2 billion in such “loans.”

Friedberg also encouraged the use of Signal for corporate messaging, preferably set to make messages disappear.

Ray is still appalled at how bad FTX’s accounting was:

Those entities that did produce financial statements used QuickBooks, Google documents, Slack communications, Excel spreadsheets, and other inadequate means for measuring the level of assets and liabilities held by the FTX Group. Entries in QuickBooks were often made months after transactions occurred, rendering real-time financial reporting and risk management impossible.

Hush money

Friedberg served as SBF’s fixer. He paid off whistleblowers and “retained” whistleblowers’ attorneys — that is, he paid them off too. 

In November 2019, FTX and Alameda were hit with a class action lawsuit that accused the companies and their executives of racketeering and market manipulation. [Docket; Decrypt, 2019]

The lawsuit doesn’t name “Plaintiff’s Attorney-1” — but this is clearly Pavel Pogodin, who set up Bitcoin Manipulation Abatement for the sole purpose of filing crypto class actions.

Alameda said at the time: “The troll has no evidence of any wrongdoing, and will not further discover any — because there was no wrongdoing to discover evidence of.” [Medium, 2019]

Nevertheless, Friedberg took the suit seriously enough that he paid Pogodin off. (The details are redacted.) The suit was dismissed in December 2019.

As a California Bar member of flawless repute, Pogodin is happy to be paid not to do anything. He sent a letter in January 2022 threatening further possible action against FTX. Friedberg offered him “$1.6 million and $50,000 paid on a monthly basis.”

In sum, Friedberg arranged for the FTX Group to pay Plaintiffs’ Attorney-1 $3,320,000 through July 2022. Upon information and belief, Plaintiffs’ Attorney-1 provided no actual legal services to the FTX Group after signing the engagement letter.

An FTX.US employee on a $200,000 salary was fired after less than two months. She sent a demand letter in December 2021 claiming that “Alameda [was] nothing more than an extension of FTX, used to bolster investor confidence in FTX projects, and in turn drive up the prices of projects FTX had developed or invested in itself” and let employees insider-trade.

Friedberg gave this employee an “extraordinary settlement” (redacted in the filing) — and made a $12 million deal to retain Whistleblower-1’s attorney. Their only work for FTX was a three-page memo.

In early 2022, an attorney working at FTX for less than three months discovered that Alameda owned North Dimension. He flagged to Friedberg that North Dimension accounts were being used to fund FTX customer withdrawals and that Alameda didn’t have the proper money transmitter licenses.

Friedberg promptly fired him. The complaint details how the attorney was paid a large (redacted) severance package.

Other FTX news

John Ray’s team has so far racked up $200 million in fees — and the fee examiner thinks this is quite reasonable. Gotta pay the undertaker: [Bloomberg; summary report, PDF] 

Without question, the fees incurred to date are remarkable, but so is the professionals’ performance. The Fee Examiner has been struck by the creativity, professionalism, and personal sacrifice of the Retained Professionals who sprung into action in November to begin transforming a smoldering heap of wreckage into a functioning Chapter 11 debtor-in-possession.

Over in the criminal case, SBF moved to dismiss 10 of the 13 charges against him. Judge Lewis Kaplan has told SBF to get knotted: “The Court has considered all of the arguments of the parties. To the extent not addressed herein, the arguments are either moot or without merit.” [Doc 136, PDF; Doc 148, PDF; Doc 149, PDF; NYT; Doc 167, PDF] 

Sam wants to blame his troubles on Fenwick & West, the law firm used by FTX and Alameda, who apparently told him that all the hamfistedly obvious crimes he did were all totally legal. The DoJ and FTX objected, and Judge Kaplan has again told Sam to get knotted: “Neither Fenwick nor the FTX Debtors are part of the ‘prosecution team,’ and the government has no obligation to produce materials that are not within its possession, custody, or control.” [Bloomberg; Doc 150, PDF; Doc 151, PDF; Doc 151-1, PDF; Doc 156, PDF; Doc 159, PDF; Doc 166, PDF]

Over at Lightcone, who build and run LessWrong and the Effective Altruism Forum: “Funding is quite tight since the collapse of FTX.” They’re asking the users for $3 million to $6 million over the next year. [LessWrong]

Posted on by Amy Castor 5

Crypto collapse: Bittrex files chapter 11, Binance loses market makers, FTX gets a tax bill, bitcoin gets apes 

  • By Amy Castor and David Gerard

Bittrex takes a dive

Bittrex’s US entity, Desolation Holdings LLC, and Bittrex Malta filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in Delaware on May 8. The move came just weeks after Bittrex shut down its US operations, which was soon after they were sued by the SEC for trading securities without registering as a securities exchange. [Bloomberg; Bittrex; case docket] 

The bankruptcy is apparently the fault of the SEC. The first-day declaration cites several SEC actions against other firms — and harps on about a “lack of regulatory clarity.” [Doc 9, PDF; first day declaration, PDF]

Bittrex says the bankruptcy will totally not impact its non-US operations, and funds are safe! Surely Bittrex didn’t do any commingling of company and customer funds like every other crypto exchange in trouble keeps turning out to have done.

The debts are largely fines levied against Bittrex by US government agencies — who are the only named creditors. OFAC is the largest creditor, owed $24.2 million. FinCEN is also a top 50 creditor with a $3.5 million claim. The SEC is listed with an undetermined amount of claims. [Doc 1, PDF]

Bittrex wishes to avail itself of a debtor-in-possession loan of 700 BTC so as to wind down Desolation and Bittrex Malta in an orderly manner and return customers’ funds. The loan will be from themselves — Aquila Holdings Inc, Bittrex’s parent entity, which is not in bankruptcy. [Liquidation plan, PDF]

The precedence of creditors (who gets paid back first) would be: themselves, then the customers, then the US government. That’s novel.

Michel de Cryptadamus notes several other interesting wrinkles. Bittrex’s US gross (not net) revenue for 2022 was $17 million, against the $30 million in government fines. “Several states alleged that BUS was undercapitalized and demanded that BUS immediately surrender its money transmitter licenses in those states.” Bittrex’s complicated corporate structure is reminiscent of FTX. And Bittrex may also be trying to protect the salaries of Bittrex executives from being seized by the SEC. [Twitter, archive]

Michel thinks the whole filing is a massive troll. We concur. The idea seems to be for Bittrex to set up a sacrificial entity to pay back their customers but stiff the US government. We are unconvinced that the government agencies will be inclined to let this one slide.

Good news for Binance

Market makers are leaving Binance US. Jane Street Group in New York and Jump Trading in Chicago — two of the world’s top commodities market makers — are pulling back from crypto in the US as regulators crack down on the industry. Their business in normal commodities is much larger, and they could do without the regulatory heat. [Bloomberg]

The Department of Justice is investigating Binance for possible violations of US sanctions against Russia. There’s already plenty of evidence that Binance has committed sanctions violations. Binance was the final destination for millions in funds from Bitzlato, an exchange shut down for money laundering. Now Dirty Bubble writes that Binance partner Advcash may be facilitating transfers from Russian banks. [Dirty Bubble]

Binance is withdrawing from Canada, owing to a surfeit of regulatory clarity. [Twitter, archive; Reuters]

Bitcoin has been trading at a premium of up to $650 on Binance US. A premium like this is usually an indication that people can’t get their dollars out of the exchange, so they buy bitcoins and move those to another exchange to cash out. [CoinDesk] 

We also saw bitcoin trading at a premium on Mt. Gox just before that exchange collapsed in 2014, and the same with QuadrigaCX, which imploded in 2019. Naïve traders who don’t understand what’s happening will often move their BTC to the dying exchange, thinking it’s an arbitrage opportunity.

Trading at a premium is not a good sign, but a worse sign is when people complain they can’t get their crypto off an exchange. Binance US has long had a reputation for demanding arbitrary new KYC documentation when users try to withdraw.

Monkey laundering comes to bitcoin

Binance paused withdrawals twice on Sunday, May 7. The first time was due to a “congestion issue.” Later in the day, Binance paused withdrawals again due to a “large volume of pending transactions.” [Twitter, archive; Twitter, archive]

For once, Binance might have been on the level. On May 7, the bitcoin mempool was clogged with 400,000 transactions waiting to be processed, and transaction fees surged.  

In bitcoin, the mempool, or memory pool, is where pending transactions pile up before a miner selects the most profitable ones and puts them together as a proposed block. If your transaction stays in the mempool too long, it gets dropped.

The best way to break a blockchain is to try to use it for something. In this case, some idiot worked out how to do NFTs on bitcoin.

“Ordinals” are a new way to create NFTs on bitcoin by linking a JPEG, video, or another image type to a satoshi, the smallest denomination of a bitcoin. Ordinals came out in January, and bitcoin has been filled with monkey pictures since. Bitcoin maxis condemn ordinals as a conspiracy to destroy bitcoin by using the network for a purpose. [Decrypt]

Child genius, adult moron

Sam Bankman-Fried’s defense team is trying to strike 10 of the 13 criminal charges against their client. They argue that the Bahamas did not agree to several of the charges — including one claim that Sam hid millions of dollars in political donations — while other claims didn’t meet the legal requirements of the underlying criminal statutes. [Docket, see filings 137-147]

The facts against SBF are solid. There’s no reason to doubt that Sam did everything the US claims. So the defense seems to be going for unreasonable doubt and hoping they have a dumb enough jury member or two.

Former federal prosecutor Sean Shecter of Lewis Brisbois says SBF’s lawyers want to preserve an appeal, so they have to try everything they can think of, “even if it involves throwing spaghetti against the wall.” He thinks the defense is likely hoping that the government gives up “nuggets of information” in response to the motions. [Law360, paywall]

Prosecutors have until May 29 to respond. Judge Lewis Kaplan will hear oral arguments on June 15. 

The IRS has hit the FTX companies with a $44 billion tax bill, with the largest chunk being $20.4 billion for Alameda. It looks like the IRS reclassified all FTX employees from contractors to employees and charged for unpaid employment taxes. [Docket, see filings April 27, 28; IRS Alameda claim, PDF; CoinDesk]

The IRS has not released its calculations in detail, but we’d assume the bill is inflated by fraud (fictitious profits), penalties, and interest. John Jay Ray is sure to fight this. But even if Ray gets that amount substantially reduced, this is still sure to be a huge hit for FTX creditors.

The IRS claims are treated as unsecured — but they will receive priority status as ordinary and necessary business expenses of the bankruptcy estate. So the IRS will come before ordinary unsecured creditors.

The searing light of regulatory clarity

Ishan Wahi will spend two years in prison for insider trading as a former product manager at Coinbase. He previously admitted to passing on confidential information from Coinbase to his brother and friend, who profited from the tips. [WSJ, paywall; DOJ press release]

In Estonia, nearly 400 VASPs (“virtual asset service providers,” the FATF term for companies dealing in crypto) have shut down or had their licenses revoked after the government’s recently enhanced terrorist financing prevention and anti-money laundering laws came into effect in March. [Protos; Estonia Financial Intelligence Unit] 

Bakkt has delisted a bunch of tokens from the institutional crypto business they bought from Apex Crypto, including several that the SEC has indicated it considers securities. “Our review process ensures those interests are best served when we contemplate the most up-to-date regulatory guidance.” [CoinDesk]

John Reed Stark thinks an SEC action against Coinbase is imminent. He explains the regulations and how they work in detail and why Coinbase doesn’t stand a chance.

Stark notes also that Coinbase’s “regulatory estoppel” claim — that the SEC approving their S-1 public offering means the SEC must have approved the exchange dealing in securities — is directly contradicted by the mandatory “no approval clause” in the S-1: “Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any other regulatory body has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.” Whoops. [LinkedIn]  

Unvaxxed bitcoin is the new bitcoin

QuadrigaCX bankruptcy claimants will get 13% on the dollar. They will be paid out the dollar value of their crypto at the time Quadriga filed for bankruptcy — April 15, 2019, when bitcoin was in the toilet.

It’s amazing that creditors will even get back that much. Most of the Quadriga money was gambled away by cofounder Gerald Cotten and filched by shady payment processors. We’re surprised no criminal charges were filed — but then, most of the money was stolen by a guy who is supposedly dead. [EY notice, PDF; CoinDesk]

Arthur Hayes of BitMEX has been tweeting at Three Arrows Capital co-founders Su Zhu and Kyle Davies because 3AC owes him $6 million following its collapse in June 2022. Rather than returning Hayes’ money, 3AC cofounder Su Zhu has filed a Singapore restraining order to prohibit Hayes from using “threatening, abusive or insulting words” and “making any threatening, abusive or insulting communication, that would cause the Applicant harassment, alarm or distress.” [Twitter, archive; Twitter, archive; CoinDesk]

BlockFi users discover that BlockFi owned their coins. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan ruled that BlockFi users who had money in BlockFi’s interest-bearing accounts gave up ownership of their bitcoins — all they owned was a liability from BlockFi — and all of the $300 million in crypto deposits is now the property of the bankruptcy estate, as is normal. [Bloomberg]   

P2P exchange Paxful has resumed operations after it shut down last month amidst a messy dispute between cofounders Ray Youssef and Artur Schaback. The entire operation has been comedy gold. Youssef and Schaback say the exchange is now owned by a custodian — who they never actually name — and the custodian, Schabeck, and Youseff all serve as directors. [Paxful, archive; CoinDesk]

In the crypto bubble, Miami crypto companies boomed with the enthusiastic support of Mayor Francis Suarez. Now there’s empty real estate and lawsuits. “Most of crypto was a pyramid scheme,” said local businessman Ryan Kirkley. Suarez is now trying to lure tech startups into Miami instead. [WSJ, paywalled]  

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who is running for US President on the gibbering insane Twitter blue check conspiracy theorist ticket, will be making the first appearance of his campaign giving the keynote at Bitcoin 2023 in Miami later this month. So, on brand then. [Twitter; NBC]

A propaganda movie is in the works for bitcoin mining — because consuming a country’s worth of electricity is actually good news for bitcoin. Based on the trailer, the film is amazing, but not in a good way. [Dirty Coin the Movie]

Media stardom  

Amy spoke to Bloomberg about the growing ranks of crypto skeptics after the crypto collapse: “There were a handful of us before, screaming into the abyss. Now there’s a lot more.” We’ll just be over here, quietly being right. [Bloomberg]

Posted on by Amy Castor 0

The Block fires a third of staff — Larry Cermak is CEO, Wintermute’s Evgeny Gaevoy joins board

Crypto news site The Block has just waved good-bye to a third of its staff.

Larry Cermak, the site’s former head of research, has been promoted to CEO by the new company board, which features Evgeny Gaevoy of crypto hedge fund Wintermute.

The move comes in the wake of The Block’s FTX funding scandal.

Don’t worry too much about how the rise of Wintermute, and the excuses for it, are disconcertingly parallel to the story of FTX/Alameda — the nigh-magical arbitrage and how Gaevoy is a mathematical genius, much as SBF was.

We beat CoinDesk on this one. Read the full story on David’s site. [David Gerard]

Posted on by Amy Castor 0

Crypto collapse: FTX family subpoenas, SBF witness tampering, Celsius bids revealed, more crypto banking woes

  • By Amy Castor and David Gerard

FTX: It’s a family affair

FTX’s lawyers have questions. Specifically, they have questions for Sam Bankman-Fried’s brother Gabriel and his parents, Joseph Bankman and Barbara Fried.

Joseph advised FTX. He recruited its first lawyers and joined FTX staff in meetings on Capitol Hill. When visiting the FTX offices in the Bahamas, he and Barbara stayed in a $16.4 million house with its title in their names. Barbara founded a political action committee called Mind the Gap, which received donations from FTX.

Gabriel launched Guarding Against Pandemics, an organization funded by Sam. Gabriel purchased a multimillion-dollar property in Washington D.C., which John Jay Ray III’s current FTX team believe was purchased using FTX customer funds.

Every member of Sam’s family had some involvement in FTX — and they aren’t responding to requests for documents. So Ray’s team and the Unsecured Creditors’ Committee (UCC) want to subpoena Joseph, Barbara and Gabriel under rule 2004. [Doc 579, PDF; Bloomberg]

We’ve detailed rule 2004 previously. Federal Rule of Bankruptcy 2004 allows tremendously broad discovery and deposition. A witness is not always entitled to attorney representation or cross-examination and has only a limited right to object to questions. 2004 exams are sometimes referred to as “fishing expeditions” — because they need to be.

Included in the same 2004 motion, Ray is also asking the court’s permission to subpoena Sam and several other FTX insiders, including FTX cofounders Gary Wang and Nishad Singh, former Alameda CEO Caroline Ellison, and former FTX COO Constance Wang. Along with SBF’s family, they have not been very responsive:

“Mr. Wang and Ms. Ellison expressly declined to provide the requested information, and Ms. Fried has ignored the Requests altogether. The Debtors have not received meaningful engagement or any response from Mr. Singh or Mr. Gabriel Bankman-Fried.”

Ray’s team are investigating the FTX hack on November 11-12, which saw $300 million in crypto siphoned off the exchange while crypto Twitter watched in horror. They’ve requested an order pursuant to Rule 2004 here too — under seal, because the information in the motion could “reveal or lead to evidence that will reveal the identity and activities of the perpetrator(s).” It sounds like they already have a very good idea who was behind the hack. [Doc 581, PDF]  

A mostly-unredacted list of FTX creditors is now available. It includes investment banks, such as Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan; media companies, such as the New York Times and Wall Street Journal; commercial airliners, including American, United, Southwest, and Spirit; as well as several large tech players, including Netflix, Apple, and Meta. Individual customers’ names remain withheld. [Doc 574, PDF] 

FTX objects to the US Trustee’s request to appoint an independent examiner. They argue an examiner would duplicate work that’s already underway by FTX, the UCC, law enforcement, and regulators. “Indeed, if history is a guide, the cost could near or exceed $100 million.” They point out that “it is difficult to imagine an examiner candidate whose qualifications exceed those of Mr. Ray.” Which is a good point. The UCC concurs. [Doc 573, PDF; Doc 571, PDF]

What’s a little witness tampering between friends?

SBF is playing fast and loose with potential witnesses in his criminal trial. He contacted “Witness-1,” the “current General Counsel of FTX US” (Ryne Miller) to work out a story with. We doubt Miller would want anything to do with such a scheme. But this was enough for the government to ask Judge Lewis Kaplan to modify Sam’s bail: [DOJ letter to judge, PDF]

“Specifically, the Government respectfully requests that the Court impose the following conditions: (1) the defendant shall not contact or communicate with current or former employees of FTX or Alameda (other than immediate family members) except in the presence of counsel, unless the Government or Court exempts an individual from this no-contact rule; and (2) the defendant shall not use any encrypted or ephemeral call or messaging application, including but not limited to Signal.”

SBF’s lawyers responded by pounding the table. Judge Kaplan has told both sides to chill. The government should get its reply in, with substantiation of its claims, by February 2. [letter, PDF; order, PDF]

Dirty Bubble has found another link between FTX and the fraud-riddled binary options industry. In September 2021, FTX purchased the ZUBR derivatives exchange for $11 million. The exchange was registered in Gibraltar. By the time Gibraltar rescinded ZUBR’s license, the exchange had no active customers. The exchange was a collaboration between Belarusian binary options and crypto “billionaire” Viktor Prokopenya and his former business partner Said Gutseriev, the son of one of Russia’s wealthiest oligarchs. [Dirty Bubble]  

(Update, March 15, 2023: Viktor Prokopenya tells us he “never had any commercial interest or other involvement in ZUBR.” Dirty Bubble has updated his story to note that FTX purchased ZUBR directly from Prokopenya’s business partner Said Gutseriev. Dirty also notes interesting connections between ZUBR and Prokopenya’s other entities in his story.) 

Would it surprise you to learn that FTX made political donations to George Santos? [SFGate]

Celsius Network: Let’s make more magic beans!

Celsius has rejected the Binance US bid for Celsius assets, and four other bids. In the January 23 hearing, Ross Kwasteniet of Kirkland & Ellis, speaking for Celsius, said the bids “have not been compelling.”

Instead, Celsius have concocted a plan to reorganize into a publicly traded company and issue a new “Asset Share Token” to creditors. Those following the Celsius disaster will recognise this as Alex Mashinsky’s very dumb and bad Kelvin Plan from September 2022.

Creditors weren’t told about the other bids. As it happened, Tiffany Fong — Celsius creditor and YouTuber — got all the bids in a leak in December. Bidders included Binance US, Bank To The Future (Simon Dixon), Galaxy Digital, Cumberland DRW, and NovaWulf. Fong posted full text of the leaked bids. [Substack; Youtube] 

  • Binance US: buy just the crypto, assume liabilities (with a haircut); excludes FTT, CEL, and other illiquid trash tokens. Pay $15 million cash.
  • Bank to the Future: crypto returned to customers pro rata. Other Celsius assets to special-purpose vehicles, customers get an ownership share. Cash to be raised through rights offering to creditors.
  • Galaxy Digital: Acquire illiquid assets and staked ETH. Pay $66.8 million cash.
  • Cumberland DRW: Purchase certain tokens and portfolio of alternative investments, excluding CEL. $1.8 billion total payment, includes various haircuts.
  • NovaWulf: Transfer substantially all assets and businesses to SEC-compliant NewCo, 100% owned by the creditors. Issue revenue share tokens. NovaWulf to pay $60-120 million, mostly in tokens. This is also a version of the Kelvin plan.

Many ad hoc creditors were disappointed that the Binance bid was rejected — but it shouldn’t be surprising, given the issues that Binance is already having with its bid for Voyager.

Frankly, we don’t think the other bids look all that great either — they’re fanciful coiner dreams that first assume the crypto market is healthy, which it isn’t.

We think Celsius should have just liquidated in July rather than taking several months and handing millions of dollars to bankruptcy professionals to get to the same place.

Banks

Silvergate is short on cash, so it’s suspended dividend payments on its preferred stock. [Business Wire] 

The stock in question (NYSE:SI) is going down the toilet. It’s crashed from $220 in November 2021 to below $14 in January 2023. Signature Bank (NASDAQ: SBNY) has gone from $365 to $127 over the past year.

Moonstone Bank says that “recent events” — FTX tried to use them as a financial laundromat — and “the changing regulatory environment around crypto businesses” — the regulators are on the warpath — have prompted it to ditch the “innovation-driven business model” it adopted in recent years. [WSJ, paywall] 

Federal bank regulators are not keen on dodgy crypto banks authorized by captured Wyoming state regulators. Custodia Bank can’t get a Fed account: [Federal Reserve]

“The Board has concluded that the firm’s application as submitted is inconsistent with the required factors under the law. Custodia is a special purpose depository institution, chartered by the state of Wyoming, which does not have federal deposit insurance. The firm proposed to engage in novel and untested crypto activities that include issuing a crypto asset on open, public and/or decentralized networks.”

Crypto.com’s old gateway for GBP and EUR was Transactive Systems of Lithuania. Transactive has been cut off by the Bank of Lithuania, after it found “significant violations and shortcomings of the Law on the Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing.” Transactive had apparently been giving accounts to a long list of low-quality institutions in low-quality jurisdictions. Transactive can no longer serve financial institutions, forex, or crypto clients. They also got cut off from the UK Faster Payments system. Your EUR and GBP sent to Crypto.com via Transactive are probably now stuck. [Twitter; Offshore CorpTalk; Bank of Lithuania, in Lithuanian]  

Before Crypto.com got kicked off Silvergate, it used to get US dollar deposits via an oddly roundabout method: customers would send USD to Circle’s account at Silvergate, and Circle would mint that much USDC and send the USDC to Crypto.com. It is possible this was not in full compliance with KYC and AML regulations. [Twitter; crypto.com, archive]

Other happy little accidents

London-based crypto exchange Luno, a subsidiary of DCG, is laying off 35% of its staff. About 330 employees will be let go from the firm, which has offices in Africa, Asia, and Europe. [WSJ, paywall; archive] 

DeFi volumes are right down. The amount of money (or “money”) involved has been flat for months, and — most importantly — you can’t get the ridiculous yields you could in the bubble. Oh no! Anyway. [Bloomberg]

Happy Penis Day, to those who celebrate

It was five years ago today, January 28, 2018, that the Prodeum initial coin offering took everyone’s money and disappeared, leaving behind only a new jargon term for “exit scam” or “rugpull.” You get a penis! And you get a penis! And you get a penis! Everybody gets a penis! [The Next Web, 2018]

Image: Sam Bankman-Sopranino and family.

Posted on by Amy Castor 2

FTX updates: How Sam Bankman-Fried got bail, and more

  • By Amy Castor and David Gerard

The entire industry is Wile E Coyote and they don’t want to look down because if they don’t look down gravity won’t acknowledge they are standing on the clear blue sky.

Patrick McKenzie

How SBF got out on bail

How did Sam Bankman-Fried get out on $250 million bail with only his parent’s $4 million Palo Alto house put up as security? A lot of people — including lawyers! — are confused by this.

The short answer is that federal court, unlike state courts, defaults to the presumption of release.

Sam was released to stay with his parents on his own personal recognizance — which is little more than a promise that he’ll show up in court again. There’s no financial obligation. The terms of Sam’s bond initially required the signatures of Sam and his parents — Barbara Fried and Joseph Bankman — for his initial release on December 22. [Bail disposition, PDF; Appearance bond, PDF]

The idea of bail is to make sure that the accused will show up in court. In the federal court system, the Bail Reform Act of 1984 says that unless someone is a flight risk, they should get bail — and the court has great leeway in setting conditions.

The judge was reasonably sure that SBF wasn’t a flight risk. This was his first arrest, he wasn’t accused of a violent crime, he was a publicly-known person, and he complied with extradition. He did have to give up his passport, though. He can’t leave Palo Alto other than to show up in court in New York.

Bail works completely differently for federal white-collar defendants than for poor people accused of crimes in a state court — where bail can be arbitrary without regard to ability to pay, and is often punitive and used to try to coerce the defendant into pleading guilty. This is the sort of bail most people will have heard about, and that seems to be the source of the confusion.

Compare Reggie Fowler, Bitfinex/Tether’s money man in the U.S. The government pushed hard to have Fowler held as a flight risk. But the judge let Fowler out on a $5 million personal recognizance bond, and he hasn’t flown yet — though his sentencing has been delayed to March. In SBF’s case, federal prosecutors weren’t even pushing to hold him.

Many are also wondering why SBF’s parents did not have to come up with 10% of the bail, or $25 million, for the bond. This is also a misconception about state versus federal bail — where the convention is that you can pay a bail bondsman a nonrefundable 10% of your bail and he’ll put up the rest. Again, this is not at all a requirement at the federal level.

While Sam and his parents didn’t have to put any money down, it’s another story if Sam disappears. Sam’s parents’ home could be seized and the government could hold the bond co-signers liable for the full amount of the bond — which Sam’s parents obviously won’t be able to pay.

In SBF’s bail is a provision that by January 5, he has to find two wealthy friends, one of whom must be a non-family member, to put up surety — they need to sign bonds in lesser amounts “to be agreed to.” But if Sam can’t find anyone else to sign, it’s not clear how concerned the court will be, as long as Sam doesn’t flee and doesn’t violate other bail conditions. Sam’s parents have until January 12 to post the equity interest in their home.

The house is technically owned by Stanford University — the original Stanford land grant said that the land could not be sold. Professors buy a multi-decade lease on houses on campus, and Bankman and Fried put up their interest in that lease as security for the bail. This does not mean that Stanford is putting up Sam’s bail, as some have been claiming.

Ken White, better known as Popehat, a criminal lawyer in Los Angeles, was surprised that the court agreed to let Sam out on bail. Is the prospect of bankrupting his parents enough to keep Sam from misbehaving? “Personally, he strikes me as a man-child sociopath unlikely to be deterred by the complete destruction of his family.”[Serious Trouble] 

Fresh hell from FTX

Caroline Ellison and Gary Wang had their plea hearings on December 19. The hearings weren’t open to the public. Bloomberg reporters went and got the transcript from the court. (You have to go to the court physically.) Ellison and Wang both said they acted as directed by Sam Bankman-Fried, and they knew what they were doing was wrong. [Bloomberg]

Ronnie Abrams, the Southern District of New York judge who was overseeing the SBF case, has stepped down: “It has come to the Court’s attention that the law firm of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, at which my husband is a partner, advised FTX in 2021, as well as represented parties that may be adverse to FTX and Defendant Bankman-Fried.” [Bloomberg]

SBF appears to have pledged the same shares in day-trader brokerage Robinhood as collateral for multiple loans. There are now four jackals circling the corpse: BlockFi, FTX creditor Yonathan Ben Shimon, FTX led by John Jay Ray, and SBF himself, who has mounting legal bills. FTX has asked the court to freeze the shares until the issue is sorted out. [Doc 291, PDF]

SBF hasn’t posted to Twitter since December 12. But he’s still using Twitter, and just followed Dogecoin co-creator, Billy Markus. [Reddit]

Other FTX fallout

The collapse of FTX had systemic effects on crypto. Basically, everyone was just using FTX as their bank.

Didier J. Mary follows crypto-colonialism, where cryptocurrency missionaries try to inveigle themselves into poor countries — now that America is sick of crypto. Smart but poor people in Africa, wanting an opportunity, thought crypto might work to help them get ahead. The usual flurry of crypto-trader academies, masterclasses, and hype followed. Bank the unbanked!

A huge number of these African enterprises kept their cryptos at FTX — the blockchain contingent at the World Economic Forum promoted FTX in particular. That’s all gone now, and everyone’s wrecked. This post is in French but is very readable with a translator. [LinkedIn, in French]

Sam Bankman-Fried ended up putting $100 million into Elon Musk’s purchase of Twitter. John Ray will definitely be calling to get that back. [Semafor]

Brendan Greeley from the Financial Times has locked down his Twitter in these post-Musk times, but in 2018 he gave us “Greeley’s First Law of Capitalism: Any industry that can afford stadium naming rights needs more aggressive regulation.” [Twitter]

Even Zhu Su from Three Arrows Capital (3AC) was calling out Alameda in 2019. [Twitter, archive] 

A&P has provided me with the world’s smallest turkey

As you sit around the Christmas table with the family, don’t forget to ask that relative how their “bot-coins” are going. Merry Christmas, and don’t let the buttcoins bite.

Feature image: This terrible picture is from a 2021 FTX Christmas tweet, in which Santa Sam takes treats out of the stockings and sends them to Alameda. [Twitter]

Posted on by Amy Castor 0

FTX: Sam Bankman-Fried out on bail, Ellison and Wang cop pleas

We just posted our latest coverage on the FTX saga. This one is on David’s blog. [David Gerard]

SBF is back on US soil, after being escorted by the FBI from the Bahamas to NY, and yes, he is free on bail. His parent’s secured their Palo Alto home on a $250 million personal recognizance bond. Their home is only worth a fraction of that.

SBF’s friends Caroline Ellison and Gary Wang have been charged as well, but they’ve ratted Sam out to save themselves. 

Expect more superseding indictments to come. The DoJ is coming down fast and hard on FTX.

The entire game in crypto right now is pretending you’re solvent when you’re not. We’ve put together a list of clever tricks that crypto firms are currently employing to do this. 

Posted on by Amy Castor 0

Crypto collapse: Regulatory altruism at FTX — Sam Bankman-Fried arrested

While I’ve been sick with a bug for a few days, David was able to finish up and post our latest. This one is on his blog. [David Gerard]

“Take the money and run” is a plan with just two parts. Sam Bankman-Fried completely failed to get around to the second part.  

After SBF’s extensive tour of confessing financial crimes to anyone from the press who would listen, the Weasel of Wall Street was arrested in the Bahamas at the request of the U.S. on Monday, December 12, where he awaits extradition.

Image by npcdad on Reddit

Posted on by Amy Castor 0

Crypto collapse: FTX headed for examiner, Bahamas crypto shenanigans

We just posted a new crypto update. This one is on David’s blog. [David Gerard]

In this episode, we cover:

  • SBF is fried, because the US Trustee wants to appoint an examiner. 
  • Your funds are on a holiday in the sun: The mystery of the disappearing FTX funds in early November. 
  • Alameda lost $1 billion on a trade involving Mobilecoin. We’re sure this had nothing to do with money laundering.
  • Sam is willing to go before the House Committee on Financial Services, as soon as he has figured out what happened to everyone’s money! 

Image: “We are all trying to find the guy who did this!”

Posted on by Amy Castor 0

Declaration of John Jay Ray — FTX is worse than Enron

John Jay Ray III took over FTX in the wee hours of November 11. Hours later, he filed for Chapter 11 in a Delaware court.

The new CEO filed his first-day declaration this morning. It’s incredible. David Gerard and I summarize it — this one is on David’s blog. [David Gerard]

  • In his 40-year career, Ray, who oversaw the Enron liquidation, has never seen “such a complete failure of corporate controls.”  
  • Ray has divided SBF’s empire into four silos, but the accounting is all unreliable because he’s gotten the numbers from SBF. 
  • Ray and his team will have to create a balance sheet and financial statements from scratch using what records they have of cash transactions.
  • FTX Digital Markets, the company’s Bahamas subsidiary, filed a for Chapter 15 in SDNY. Ray’s team is asking the court to move the Chapter 15 case to Delaware. 
  • Ray thinks the filing in SDNY was shenanigans by SBF and unnamed agents of the Bahamas government!
  • SBF’s late night DMs with a Vox reporter, published the next day, make it looks like he was in on the plot.
Posted on by Amy Castor 0