Stalking a charity: Why the FBI raided Kraken founder Jesse Powell’s home

  • By Amy Castor and David Gerard
  • If you like our work, become a patron! Here’s Amy’s Patreon, and here’s David’s. Sign up today!

Jesse Powell, who launched the Kraken crypto exchange in 2013, got a surprise knock on the door in March when the FBI showed up at his $11 million Los Angeles home for an unannounced search — and left with some of his electronics.

Powell’s house was searched because of allegations that he was hacking and cyber-stalking Verge Center for the Arts, a Sacramento non-profit that he founded in 2007 and bankrolled for several years.

In the wake of the FBI search, Powell is now suing Verge for booting him off the board in 2022. [New York Times, archive]

After the crypto bubble popped in May 2022, Powell became notably more vocal in his crank political views. We’re guessing the Verge board was fed up with his antics, and it wasn’t helpful to them in dealing with more normal art supporters.

Powell feels deeply hurt by getting ousted from the board of Verge. He responded by suing Verge to return his donations to the charity and to reinstate him to the board. We’re not sure those two things go together.

How Verge happened

Powell got his start trading Magic: the Gathering game cards as a teenager in the 1990s. That’s how he met his school friend Roger Ver, who later became a huge bitcoin investor and promoter. 

Like a lot of other early bitcoiners, Powell was into video gaming. Many games have their own in-game currencies — often called “gold” — that gamers use to buy and sell digital items, like characters and weapons.  

In 2001, Powell co-founded Lewt, an online company that sold virtual items and currencies related to games like Blizzard Entertainment’s Diablo II and World of Warcraft.

How did Lewt work? When Diablo III came out in 2012, Powell wrote on his personal blog that he was “Offering $1,000,000+/yr for reliable, unlimited and exclusive Diablo 3 item and gold supply.” [Forthewin, 2012, archive]

Powell didn’t ask how or where you obtained that supply: “Please take measures to anonymize yourself when contacting me.” 

It’s difficult to overstate how much the majority of gamers hate guys like this. GameFAQs user FindKenshi wrote in May 2012: “The man made hundreds of millions of dollars off of ‘black market’ item sales, and his massive supply came from a never ending stop of exploits, hacks, insiders from Blizzard, and other sources … No wonder hundreds of accounts are getting stolen every day.” [GameFAQs, 2012, archive]

In 2007, Powell took some of the money he earned from selling virtual game items and leased a long-empty former Napa Auto Parts warehouse in Sacramento on the corner of 19th and V. Streets. He invited area artists to apply for free studio space. And so, Verge was born, initially as a commercial enterprise.

In 2010, Verge Center for the Arts was incorporated as a nonprofit. The space moved to a new location at 625 S. Street on the corner of 7th and S. Streets. Verge bought this building in 2014 when it merged with the Center for Contemporary Art Sacramento. [Baartquake, 2009; Verge]

Verge executive director Liv Moe claims responsibility for growing the arts group into a commercial gallery. Today, Verge houses three to four exhibitions per year, offers classes, labs, and workshops for artists, and has over 40 resident artists. [LinkedIn, archive]

Powell’s erratic behavior

Jesse Powell holds many bizarre opinions, which he’s been happy to express for years. A lot of these opinions are quite prevalent in the bitcoin world. 

Powell fully subscribes to the conspiracy-originated “sound money” theories of bitcoin — though at least he doesn’t believe the US is headed for hyperinflation. He is, however, a committed bitcoin moon boy: “when you measure it in terms of dollars, you have to think it’s going to infinity.” [Fortune, 2020; Bloomberg, 2021, video]

Powell also a COVID conspiracy theorist and vaccine denialist. He believes in “natural immunity,” claims there exists an “anti-science Cult of Vaxx eugenics program,” and warns of a “China COVID psyop.” He is outraged at the lack of respect for “alternative treatments,” such as ivermectin — which, to be clear, doesn’t do anything for COVID, and only cranks think so. But Powell assures us that he respects “vaxxed people, some of whom are statists with compromised immune systems.” [Twitter, archive; Twitter, archive; Twitter, archive; Twitter, archive; Twitter, archive; Twitter, archive; Twitter, archive]

So Powell is nuts — or “eccentric,” since he’s rich. That’s not a major problem as long as he’s not acting-out nuts where people outside the bitcoin world can hear him. But after the crypto market crashed in May 2022, Powell started acting out.

In June 2022, the New York Times — or “Satan,” if you’re a Silicon Valley tech CEO — wrote about workplace issues at Kraken after it got hold of a “culture document” that Powell had written up and distributed to staff. [New York Times, archive]

A later version of the guide was posted publicly — one that, among other changes, no longer explicitly listed the rights to COVID denial and bearing arms that were in the version the New York Times saw. [Kraken, archive]

Powell was doing things at Kraken that would have been disciplinary offenses in any reasonable workplace — particularly in California — if he were not the CEO. As Jesse described the issues he was having with employees: [Twitter, archive]

5/ What are they upset about?

  • * DEI (Silicon Valley’s version)
  • * pronouns, whether someone can identify as a different race and be allowed to use the N-word
  • * whether differences in human sex exist at all
  • * being respected and unoffended
  • * being “harmed” by “violent” words

In a company Slack channel labeled “and you thought 4chan was full of trolls,” the person asking if he could identify as a different race to say slurs in the workplace and who led discussions of whether women were just naturally stupider than men and whether “most American ladies have been brainwashed in modern times” was, of course, Powell himself.

After the New York Times story, Powell tweeted: “Back to dictatorship.” [Twitter, archive]

Three months later, in September 2022, Powell stepped down from his role as CEO of Kraken. Powell was still Kraken’s largest shareholder and became chairman of the board. [Kraken, archive; New York Times, archive]

Nobody had the power to fire Powell, so he would have stepped down voluntarily — likely under pressure. We suspect that someone convinced him that his HR attitude was not going to be good for a business that dealt with highly regulated financial services and was already under investigation for sanctions violations.

Guiding principles: Powell sues Verge

After the FBI raid, Powell sued Verge and Verge’s treasurer and counsel Phil Cunningham in June 2023. Powell alleged that Verge directors conspired against him while continuing to take his money, then pushed him out. His PR company kindly sent us a copy of the complaint, as written up by his attorney, Brandon Fox. [Complaint, PDF]

Powell says that he had provided Verge with years of financial and technical support — and the Verge board turned on him last summer. On June 20, 2022 — shortly after the New York Times story — the board held a secret meeting where they declared Powell’s seat vacant as of October 2019. 

Since Powell didn’t attend board meetings at all — he says he didn’t have to as a founding member — he didn’t learn that he was out until October 2022, when he discovered he had been removed from the board’s distribution list and his name had been wiped from Verge’s public-facing platforms.

Powell put $1.5 million into Verge, according to the complaint. He registered vergeart.com — the domain name Verge used up until June 2022 — and paid for the domain and its hosting fees. He also paid for Verge’s G Suite and Slack accounts.

Verge asked for the domains and accounts back so that “no one individual owns anything important to the org” — which is reasonable and normal, and Verge really should have insisted on this in 2010 when it became a non-profit.

(That said, we fully understand that it can take charities ages to get around to basic things.)

​​After Powell was kicked off the board, Verge set up a new domain, vergecontemporaryart.org, and redirected the vergeart.com domain. Powell said that the vergeart.com was his domain and he objects to Verge putting the redirect in place “without Mr. Powell’s permission or awareness.”

Powell says that Verge founding director Liv Moe, Verge president Gwenna Howard, and Cunningham wanted him gone because “they disagreed with what they believed to be his views on certain social, cultural, and political issues.” Well, yes.

Howard wrote to Powell: “The Board finds your views to be completely contrary to Verge’s Guiding Principles.” These would have been the views revealed in the June 2022 New York Times story. [Guiding principles, archive]

Verge’s guiding principles state that “Verge is committed to becoming a more open and welcoming organization” and seeks to embrace “different ethnicities, skin colors, gender identities and body types, religious beliefs, physical or cognitive challenges, or socio-economic standing.”

Powell says his views do align with Verge’s guiding principles, and that it was actually Moe who violated the principles. His evidence is two tweets from several years back mentioning white people.

Cunningham’s cease and desist to Powell

Powell’s behavior led to Cunningham writing to Powell and Kraken on November 2, 2022 — two months after Powell stepped down as CEO. Powell claims in his suit that Cunningham “defamed him with falsehoods”:

In telling Mr. Powell’s employer that, among other things, Mr. Powell effectively hacked Verge’s domain and accounts, blocked Verge’s access to its accounts and domain, and refused to relinquish control over Verge’s domain and accounts, Mr. Cunningham, individually, and Verge, acting through Mr. Cunningham as its agent, expressed false statements about Mr. Powell and implied that Mr. Powell was unprofessional and dangerous, and that he had committed a crime.

This letter wasn’t some casual personal communication — it was Cunningham writing “in my official capacity as counsel for VERGE Center for the Arts, a California not for profit corporation.” [Letter, PDF]

This was a legal demand to cease and desist hampering the operations of the charity.

Cunningham complains that Powell has blocked Verge from its usual email accounts and interfered with its technology services. He complains of the “substantial cost and delay” that Powell has incurred for Verge.

Jesse didn’t take his ouster lying down — he used the old vergeart.com domain that he still controlled to and put up a website saying that he was still on the board!

VERGE believes you have used its old domain to create an internet copy of the VERGE website and then changed that website to reflect that you are still a member of the board of directors.

Unsurprisingly, Verge considers this behavior may cause them reputational damage — whether Powell owns the registration to vergeart.com or not.

Cunningham cites California precedent that “your control of the domain names is like owning a storage locker and you refuse to give VERGE the key to the locker so it can retrieve its property.”

Cunningham’s key point is:

The business records and email communications associated with VERGE are the personal property of VERGE.

Powell fails to realize this. He paid the bills for the accounts — but the contents belong to the charity, which is its own entity.

What happens now?

Powell wants Verge to pay damages determined by trial and disgorge the money he gave them after he was covertly booted. He also demands to be put back onto the board.

Those two things aren’t going to go together. Powell put his heart and soul into Verge for years — but Verge is a separate corporation from its founder, and its founder’s views have diverged from the charity’s. Powell’s suit repeatedly fails to understand that the charity is not his personal property.

This suit is not sane and balanced behavior. It’s completely sincere, and Powell’s hurt and pain are real — he feels betrayed. But that’s not enough to make a lawsuit a good or viable idea.

At the very least, Jesse should have contacted his lawyer before he held Verge’s daily office work accounts hostage and edited its website.

We would expect the equitable outcome to end up being something like, Powell giving back the domain and email accounts and Verge returning some of his donations. But that may be too reasonable for Powell.

Verge has until August 7 to respond to Powell’s complaint. We look forward to hearing Verge’s side of the story. 

News: Craig Wright suing more people, exchanges respond by delisting BSV, and Arwen launches

I am trying to make my news posts shorter with an effort to focus mainly on cryptocurrency exchanges, unless something else comes up that is just fun to write about. If you enjoy my stories, tips are always welcome via Patreon.

At a hearing on April 18, Quadriga’s court-appointed monitor continued its battle with the exchange’s third-party payment processors to get them to hand over transaction records and funds. The court also extended Quadriga’s creditor protection until June 28.

Screen Shot 2019-04-19 at 9.53.58 AM
Dorian Nakamoto, one of those who turned out not to be Craig Wright.

Craig Wright, who claims to be Satoshi, is suing people who are accusing him of not being Satoshi. (Wright has yet to prove he actually is.) As mentioned in my last newsletter, it all started when Wright sued twitter user Hodlonaut. Wright has now followed with libel suits against Bitcoin podcast host Peter McCormack, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin and crypto blog Chepicap. (CoinGeek, a publication financed by Calvin Ayre, Wright’s billionaire backer, has a full story.)

Naturally, the Bitcoin community is up in arms. In response, Binance—an exchange that has been traditionally unselective in the coins it lists—has delisted BSV (stands for Bitcoin Satoshi’s Vision), the coin that resulted from the bitcoin fork spearheaded by Wright and Ayre. The move was followed by several other exchanges delisting BSV, including Kraken, ShapeShift and Bittylicious. Blockchain.info removed support for BSV from its wallet.

Kraken’s BSV delisting was in response to a poll it put up on Twitter. This quote from Kraken founder Jesse Powell is priceless. He says:

“In this case, it is a unique case for us, we haven’t delisted any other coins because the founders, people who are promoting it turned out to be total assholes.”

Angela Walch, a law professor at St. Mary’s University School of Law, compared the #DelistBSV movement to Visa and PayPal not processing Wikileaks transactions and expressed surprise the crypto world was cheering it.

Meanwhile Gemini’s Tyler Winklevoss says Gemini never listed BSV in the first place, and Chandler Guo, a Chinese miner who has made a fortune on ICOs and Bitcoin forks, announced that he would do the opposite and list BSV.

Crypto exchanges just aren’t pulling in the gazillions they used to. Binance generated about $78 million in profit last quarter, up 66 percent quarter-over-quarter. But that still falls short of full year 2018, when the exchange made $446 million in profits. Coinbase brought in revenue of $520 million in 2018, down 44 percent year-over-year.

Hacks, inside jobs and irreversible goof-ups are pushing some crypto exchanges to the brink. Coinnest, once South Korea’s third-largest exchanges, is closing. Users have until April 30 to get their funds off the exchange. Coinnest lost $5.3 million in a botched airdrop in January, though it blames its closure on low trading volume.

Elsewhere, on April 10, Bittrex’s application for a BitLicense (required to do business in New York State) was rejected—in part, because Bittrex customers were using fake names, like “Give me my money,” “Elvis Presley” and “Donald Duck” to trade.

Bittrex says the NY Department of Financial Services (DFS) “sent four people who didn’t know anything about blockchain.” DFS responded again, saying the exchange “continues to misstate the facts” and “presents a misleading picture about the denial.”

Binance is about to begin the process of moving its BNB (currently an ERC20 token) off the Ethereum network and onto Binance Chain, its custom blockchain. Interestingly, The Block’s Larry Cermak notes that Binance has quietly changed its white paper to remove a clause about the exchange using 20 percent of its profits to buy back BNB.

Arwen, a self-custody solution that uses on-blockchain escrows and off-blockchain atomic swaps to allow traders to maintain control of their keys while they trade, launched on Singapore’s KuCoin earlier this week. KuCoin raised $20 million in VC funding last year, and it is the first exchange to partner with Arwen, created by a company of the same name based in Boston.

Finally, Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), the owner of the New York Stock Exchange, is reportedly eyeing a New York license for its crypto exchange Bakkt. The launch date for Bakkt has been delayed for months due to skepticism from the CFTC. The regulator appears most concerned over how tokens will be stored.

 

 

News: I’m speaking in Vancouver, Kraken’s obsession with Quadriga, and Patryn may have been trading on BitMEX

Hello new readers! If you enjoy my crypto meanderings and paywall-free Quadriga resources, please subscribe to my Patreon account. I’m an independent writer, and I need your support. You can subscribe for as little as $2 a month.  

I will be giving a presentation on Quadriga at MPWR Crypto Mining Summit in Vancouver, B.C. on March 12 at 4:15 p.m. local time. If you lost money on Quadriga, you can get into the event for free. Simply send an email to community@biresearch.ca.  

I’m obviously insane to have driven to the Quadriga hearing in Halifax on March 5, given the weather conditions. I went with fellow crypto-skeptic Kyle Gibson. We spun off the road twice. It was horrifying. Apparently, my car was burning oil the entire way.  

On the upside, seeing the hearing live at the Nova Scotia Supreme Court was really cool. Also, while in Halifax, I interviewed with Sheona McDonald, who is working on a Quadriga documentary. I hope to see her again in Vancouver, where she is based. 

As far as the hearing goes, the big news is that Quadriga was granted a 45-day stay and the judge gave a thumbs up to the appointment of Peter Wedlake, a senior vice president and partner with Grant Thornton, as a chief restructuring officer (CRO) for the firm.

I was struck by the number of paid professionals sitting before the judge—somewhere between eight and nine, and a few others in the back of the room. What is the hourly rate for a lawyer? And some of them had to fly in, too. 

And now, one more mouth to feed: the CRO. According to court documents, Quadriga needs a CRO for “ongoing direction” related to its affairs during its Companies’ Creditor Arrangement Act (CCAA) and in the event of an “anticipated sales process.”  

This talk of selling Quadriga is a recurring theme, so watch for it to come up again. The biggest value in the sell would likely be Quadriga’s user base. A similar effort is being made to revive Mt. Gox, the Tokyo-based crypto exchange that went bust in 2014.

The law firms for Quadriga’s affected users have so far heard from 800 creditors—not a lot, when you consider there are 115,000 affected users. But keep in mind there is no formal claims process at the moment.   

How will customer claims be evaluated? Court-appointed monitor Ernst and Young (EY) is working to gain access to the exchange’s platform data in AWS, where all the customer trades are located. (EY had to get a court order at the hearing to do so.) It will be interesting to see what the monitor finds when it cracks that egg—maybe nothing. Other trails have already been wiped clean. Quadriga has no books and six identified bitcoin cold wallets were found empty, except for an inadvertent transfer reported earlier. 

I recently wrote about WB21, the shady third-party payment processor that is holding $12 million CAD ($9 million USD) in Quadriga funds, according to court documents submitted in January. After I published the story, WB21, threatened me with legal action. I responded by posting the documents they sent. Since then, I’ve been getting anonymous threats via social media and email, telling me to stop talking about Quadriga.  

Kyle Torpey wrote how bitcoin users in Canada are being targeted with audits by the Canada Revenue Agency (CDA). It is possible this could deter some affected Quadriga users from registering their claims, particularly if they are worried about anyone finding out about their crypto investments. 

Elsewhere in the news, Kraken is offering a reward for any info leading to the finding of Quadriga’s lost coins. The US-based crypto exchange writes:  

“It is up to our sole discretion which tips warrant a reward, if any. The total of all rewards will not exceed $100,000 USD. Kraken may end this reward program at any point in time. All leads collected by Kraken will be provided to the FBI, RCMP or other law enforcement authorities, who have an active interest in this case.”

Screen Shot 2019-03-10 at 4.11.20 PM.pngKraken’s CEO Jesse Powell has done two podcasts talking about Quadriga. Why is he so interested? If you recall, Kraken acquired Canadian crypto exchange Cavirtex in January 2016, so it has some Canadian customers. A few people I spoke with speculated that Kraken may have an interest in acquiring Quadriga’s user base. Otherwise, $100,000 USD seems like a lot of money to throw around for an exchange that let go of 57 people in September.

After this post went live, Powell sent me a few comments via email. He assured me the only purpose of Kraken’s reward was to help locate more assets for the Quadriga creditors and uncover any potential foul play. I reminded him that EY is already doing its own investigation into the lost funds. As of yet, Quadriga is not a criminal case.

As for acquiring the Quadriga platform and its user base, Powell thinks the platform is worthless and the user base probably significantly overlaps with Kraken’s already. “We would be open to acquiring the client list, but it wouldn’t be for much,” he said.

He also pointed out that “a lot of money” is relative and unrelated to his firm’s earlier layoffs. “Kraken increased its profitability in September,” he said. “Would you think $100,000 USD was a lot for Amazon, who let go a few hundred people last February?”

Lest there be any lingering doubt, Globe and Mail posted convincing evidence linking Quadriga cofounder Michael Patryn to convicted felon Omar Dhanani. The two appear to be one and the same. I think we can lay that one to rest now. 

Meanwhile, The Block wrote about Patryn allegedly trading large positions on BitMEX, an unregulated exchange that lets you bet on whether the price of bitcoin will go up or down. You place all your bets in bitcoin, and you can leverage up to 100x. It’s a great way to risk losing all of your money. (I wrote about BitMEX for The Block last year.) There’s been speculation as to whether Patryn was gambling with Quadriga’s customer funds.

Earlier, Coinbase also brought up the possibility that Quadriga was operating a fractional reserve after the exchange suffered multimillion dollar losses in June 2017 due to a smart contract bug.

Bottom line: anything is possible. Nobody knew what was going on inside Quadriga — and they still don’t. The exchange had no official oversight and as of early-2016, only one person was in charge of that platform and all the money it held, and that was Gerald Cotten, the exchange’s now deceased CEO.  

More information will come out as EY continues with its work. I can only imagine the private conversations occurring between the accountants (and lawyers) as more details in the CCAA process emerge. Welcome to crypto!

Read “How the hell did we get here: a timeline of Quadriga events” for the full story.