Crypto is going sideways: Avi Eisenberg trial begins, Uniswap gets a Wells notice, Bitfinex Securities in El Salvador

  • By Amy Castor and David Gerard

“this ape is a message
we considered ourselves to be a powerful yacht club
this ape is not an ape of honor
no highly esteemed juice is slurped here”

— more falafel please, SA

What are you gonna do, convict me?

Avi Eisenberg’s criminal commodities fraud trial started on April 9 and continues for two weeks. Eisenberg is the DeFi trader who drained Mango Markets of $110 million in October 2022 by manipulating the price of MNGO, the exchange’s native token. [CoinDesk]

Eisenberg used various anonymous accounts to take a long position on MNGO, drive up the price of MNGO ridiculously high, use the inflated value of MNGO to “borrow” all of the crypto on Mango Markets, and then default. He cashed out and flew to Israel that day. He bragged about his brilliant trade on Discord. He even tweeted: “What are you gonna do, arrest me?”

Eisenberg returned to the US and was arrested in Puerto Rico in December 2022. He’s been held in New Jersey ever since. 

Extensive and detailed laws exist on commodity market manipulation. Merely trading with intent to manipulate is a crime.

Almost all of what goes on in DeFi was always just straight-up illegal by the letter of US law. The CFTC first warned that it was unhappy about the highly manipulated state of crypto markets as far back as 2017.

This will be a tough one for Eisenberg to win. The defense does not dispute the sequence of events. They argue that Eisenberg was simply using the protocol as designed — code is law. The DOJ is arguing that just because you can do something doesn’t mean you should.

The defense has tried to impeach a government expert witness by … sandbagging him with documents saying he owes back taxes? If that’s the best they have, then Eisenberg is in trouble. [Twitter, thread]

Inner City Press has been covering the Eisenberg trial. [Twitter, thread; Twitter, thread; Twitter, thread; Twitter, thread]  

No, “fun markets” are a dumb and bad idea

In discussing Mango, Matt Levine of Bloomberg, who we usually regard highly, floats an old libertarian dream idea: what if we just … throw out regulation for a large chunk of the crypto market? [Bloomberg, archive]

I am just saying that you could resolve those disagreements by letting everyone go their separate ways. Have Nice Crypto — probably the bulk of it? — where manipulation is disfavored and government intervention is, at least in theory, welcomed. And have Fun Crypto for the applied game theorists to play their games against each other. Have a market that makes it explicit, in advance, on the web page, “Anything that you can do on our platform is allowed, and if the results are absurd then that is fun for you and bad for someone else, you’re on notice!”

This is an amazing thing to write when the crypto collapse of 2022 was precisely how that approach worked out in practice. But the answer to most libertarian dreams of deregulation is “on the other hand, history.”

It’s true that if it’s your money, you have the God-given right to set it on fire. If you really want to get into investments forbidden to retail, you can probably find a way to send your money down a hole.

But when we let companies promote that sort of investment to ordinary people, what happens in practice is that the investors go all-in on the highest-interest bet, and then they lose the lot. This is extremely well understood from the historical record!

DeFi is a dumpster fire. Everything collapses weekly in flames and screaming. Our dear friends the crypto degens like it that way. It’s a warm and cozy dumpster fire they have there.

In zero-interest times, people couldn’t make a sufficient return from sane investments — so they got into insane investments. They put their money into Celsius, Voyager, and Terra-Luna.

Celsius took money from retail customers and put it into DeFi. In fact, Celsius was the third biggest single player in the DeFi markets. It literally hired a DeFi trader, Jason Stone of KeyFi, to manage its investments and give retail investors huge exposure to the dumpster fire.

Levine assumes that if the dumpster fire is set up as a “fun market” that somehow the fire won’t spread. But we know from Celsius that market dumpster fires do spread.

In the fraud trial of former Celsius CEO Alex Mashinsky, the DOJ is currently collecting victim impact statements. We don’t expect Mashinsky’s victims had a lot of “fun.” Mashinsky probably did, though. That’s what “fun markets” mean in practice. [Twitter]

Market contagion is one of the US Treasury’s greatest fears about crypto — because they know all about dumpster fires too.

What we have for a “fun market” in the US are markets for accredited and institutional investors — where you can buy all the dubious magic beans you like. But even there, laws against misrepresentation and market manipulation still apply. There might be historical reasons for this.

Levine talks a whole lot about the interesting and intricate financial engineering possibilities of crypto and hardly ever about its real life victims. We realize the first is his ambit, but the second sort of come with the deal.

Esto no puede ser tan estúpido, debes estar explicándolo mal

Bitfinex Securities is an exciting new crypto securities platform run by the fine people who brought you the Bitfinex crypto exchange and the Tether stablecoin. They also wrote themselves special new laws in El Salvador to let them set up Bitfinex Securities.

There have been a couple of tokens on Bitfinex Securities, but they haven’t had any trades for months at a time. [Protos]

A new token, HILSV, hopes to raise $6.25 million to build a hotel near the Aeropuerto Internacional de El Salvador: “The Hampton by Hilton.” HILSV has been seeking out rather more publicity. [Bitfinex, archive; Bitfinex, archive; La Prensa Gráfica, in Spanish]

HILSV will trade on Bitfinex Securities against tethers and US dollars. The tokens are medium-term corporate bonds, priced at $1,000 each. Buyers are promised a remarkable 10% annual interest, paid semi-annually, for five years and then they get their principal back. The raise is scheduled to begin May 13.

The developer, Inversiones Laguardia (Laguardia Investments), is a real developer. They’re also good friends of the current El Salvador government and have had close and fruitful relations with past administrations.

Founder Ricardo Laguardia said in the press release that it would be impossible to raise the funds without access to new capital markets.

This seems an implausible claim. Hotels are a well-understood business, Laguardia is an experienced developer, and $6.25 million is a plausible sort of price for a new hotel complex. If your business plan was sane, why wouldn’t you just take out a loan? And why would you offer to pay 10% interest when you could get a loan for less?

We suspect that Inversiones Laguardia is doing this hotel project with an offering that will obviously be filled just so Bitfinex can get its new stock market up and running. We expect they have actual investors (and likely friends of the Salvadoran government) already lined up.

Of course, someone might have $6.25 million in dirty tethers that need shining up. But we’re sure Inversiones Laguardia would never be a party to such activities.

Every crypto real estate project in El Salvador since 2021 has been a rugpull or a nothing burger. This is the fourth attempt at a crypto-backed real estate project — after the Astro Babies NFT-backed casino and the Bitcoin Towers and Fusso NFT projects.

Laguardia does have a history of surprisingly sweet deals, such as the lease for a development at the same airport in 2018 for a remarkably low rent. We’re sure it’s all fine, though. [Portal de Transparencia, PDF, in Spanish, 2018

Uniswap: the searing light of regulatory clarity

Uniswap is the largest decentralized exchange in DeFi. The idea is that they run an exchange trading tokens that are almost all unregistered penny stocks. Then they claim that somehow they don’t actually run the exchange — except the bit where they get paid for not-running the exchange.

But if you make money from running an exchange for unregistered securities, the SEC may knock on your door. So Uniswap got a Wells notice letting them know of forthcoming enforcement action — reportedly for operating as an unregistered securities broker and an unregistered securities exchange. [CoinDesk; blog post, archive]

This is no surprise. The SEC announced it was investigating Uniswap in 2021. Enforcement lawyers told the WSJ they were looking into how investors used the exchange and how the exchange was marketed. [WSJ, 2021, archive]

Uniswap runs on the Ethereum blockchain. It has its own native token, UNI, that allows traders and investors to vote in its DAO. The exchange is extensively US-linked.

Hayden Adams founded Uniswap in 2018. He got an initial $11 million investment round in 2019 and another $165 million in 2022. Top investors — and holders of the UNI token — include Paradigm, a16z, and Union Square Ventures. [Form D; Techcrunch, 2022

Because Uniswap is “decentralized and there are no listing fees,” anyone can list a token on the exchange and create an alleged price in dollars for their token. Coincidentally, nearly all tokens on Uniswap turn out to be rugpulls. [arXiv, 2022, PDF]

Uniswap trader Nessa Risley led a class action against Uniswap in 2022. She claimed that the investors were “intimately involved” in overseeing its operations and were therefore responsible for the fraud on the exchange. She also said Uniswap had been operating as an illegal exchange and brokerage. 

Judge Katherine Polk Failla dismissed Risley’s suit in August 2023, saying that the individuals behind the scam tokens were in the wrong, not the platform itself. (Faillia is also overseeing the SEC lawsuit against Coinbase.) Risley is appealing. [Opinion and order, PDF; case docket]

Adams says he’s “ready to fight” the SEC all the way to the Supreme Court if necessary. [Twitter]

The SEC filed enforcement actions against Coinbase, Bittrex, and Kraken for dealing in securities without a license. We strongly suspect they’ll call out a bunch of tokens on Uniswap that are securities, including UNI.

We wouldn’t be surprised if Uniswap was forced to shut down. But they probably have the resources to fight for a while. 

Miners dumping

The bitcoin price has been all over the place. One reason is that miners have been dumping their holdings while number is up. We suspect that’s what’s causing quite a few of the recent crashes. [CoinDesk]

Miners are now competing with AI for cheap power in the US. These are the AI guys who make the same bad excuses for their ghastly power consumption as the crypto miners. [Bloomberg, archive]

Central banking, not very on the blockchain

Central bank digital currencies aren’t getting a lot of consumer takeup. Franklin Knoll, a payment specialist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas, writes about three retail CBDCs issued in the Caribbean over the last four years and how they’ve fallen flat. [Kansas City Fed]

Knoll looked at the Bahamas Sand Dollar, DCash from the Eastern Caribbean Currency Union (ECCU), and the Jamaican JAM-DEX.

Each launched with great fanfare — but “the new payment methods have thus far seemed to fall flat with consumers, merchants, and, in some cases, the financial institutions meant to operate the payment platforms.”

As David wrote when the Bahamian Sand Dollar and DCash launched, money is a social construct. You can’t just build a system and think people will come to it.

Good news for bitcoin

Christopher Harborne’s lawyers are at it again. Following their defamation lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal, they sent another letter to Dirty Bubble (James Block) regarding his story “Tether’s Secret Agent.” Last time, Block edited bits out of his story. This time, he took the entire story down. He says he’s contemplating “next steps.” [Twitter]

The SEC is pivoting to AI too. They busted a couple of investment advisors for saying they used AI when they didn’t. [SEC]

Media stardom

Amy is in a documentary on NFTs called “NFT:WTF?” It will be on Netflix in the UK starting April 10. You can also watch it on YouTube. [Youtube]

_________________________________

And now a word from our sponsors!

Tether, FTX, and Deltec Bank: MONEY TIME

  • By Amy Castor and David Gerard

There’s a lot of class action lawsuits in crypto. We mostly don’t note these — they so rarely go anywhere — but a consolidated class action against FTX’s various enablers has turned up some interesting allegations concerning everyone’s favorite stablecoin, Tether, and its remaining US dollar banker, Deltec Bank of the Bahamas.

Tether has banked with Deltec since 2018. Deltec was one of the few banks in the world that would have anything to do with Tether after their deal with Crypto Capital led to $850 million of the Tether reserve being frozen.

We already knew that FTX/Alameda, also based in the Bahamas, was in it up to their necks with Tether. Alameda was Tether’s largest customer between 2020 and 2022 that wasn’t a crypto exchange.

The new allegations, filed in a Florida federal court, are that Deltec was an active and enthusiastic part of the FTX and Alameda business schemes that lost billions of customer dollars and for which Sam Bankman-Fried is now in jail.

The amended complaint

The new amendment to the complaint, filed on February 16, is based on 7,000 pages of direct text messages that were offered up in discovery. The full amended complaint is 158 pages. The Deltec shenanigans are paragraphs 133 to 260. [Motion, PDF; Complaint, PDF; Case docket

The complaint hammers on Deltec’s relationship with Tether, FTX, and Alameda. It states that Jean Chalopin, the head of Deltec, and Gregory Pepin, Deltec’s deputy CEO, played a key role in FTX’s money laundering.

FTX/Alameda: MONEY PARTY THE BEST PARTY

Bankman-Fried’s empire came crashing down in November 2022, when it was revealed the company had an $8 billion hole in its customer accounts. The complaint lists the various defendants in the case — Gary Wang, Nishad Singh, Caroline Ellison, Ryan Salame, and others. 

Deltec provided banking for FTX Trading, FTX US, and Alameda. Pepin manually allocated incoming customer funds to FTX accounts and moved the funds to Alameda. Deltec also extended a “secret line of credit” to Alameda of $1.8 billion.

Deltec was a money launderette for FTX. They would happily let all those annoying compliance requirements slide for their very good friends at FTX.

Deltec would pass compliance questions from intermediary banks to FTX or just make up fake invoices to account for otherwise unexplained transactions. Here’s Pepin:

[Ibanera] are asking info about [the foregoing FTX customer] do you have the agreement linked to this deposit? so i can get [the wire] release asap?

Idea 🙂 Send me a PDF of the term and condition + Invoice and I’ll send

… Now if you send me a XLS sample or whatever of invoice I can populate invoice myself later can do? 

Pepin would send ecstatic messages in the group chat when a batch of wires came in. The complaint has a whole page of Pepin posting like this:

MOOONNNEEEYYY TTTIIIIMMMMEEEE

I HEAR A MONEY TIME IS HAPPENING HERE I THINK I NEED TO BE A PART OF IT

doing my best to hold the wall but such money tsunami is hard to handle dude

MONEY PARTY THE BEST PARTY

it is MONEY TIME INDEEDE

Deltec Bank also moved FTX customer deposits directly to Alameda on request, in the billions. Deltec would even run out of cash to pay FTX customer withdrawals and have to ask Alameda to cover for them. Pepin: “Lena you send today the 300m? or later? As we won’t have liquidity”.

Moonstone Bank

Chalopin bought Farmington Bank in Washington in 2020 in a deal with FTX, turning a tiny local bank into a crypto service company — mostly for FTX and Alameda. The bank was then renamed Moonstone.

Moonstone joined the Federal Reserve without notifying the Fed of its change of business plan from a local farmers’ bank to a crypto money launderette. The Fed shut Moonstone down in August 2023.

North Dimension: Ipad 11 “ich Cell Phone

North Dimension was a fake electronics company that FTX/Alameda created so they could set up accounts at Silvergate Bank and Signature Bank in its name. FTX had customers wire money to North Dimension’s Silvergate and Signature accounts so that it would go directly to Alameda. This was part of the money laundering charge that Bankman-Fried was convicted on.

Pepin made sure that deposits from North Dimension came through to Deltec and were sent to FTX or Alameda as needed.

FTX put actual effort into the North Dimension bit of the fraud, if only the barest minimum. North Dimension even had a website!

The site didn’t actually work — all the product links went to the contact page. It was “rife with misspellings and bizarre product prices,” including “sale prices that were hundreds of dollars above a regular price” — such as the fabulously desirable “Ipad 11 “ich Cell Phone,” normally $410, but available at a sale price of just $899.

The North Dimension website is in the Internet Archive. The “About” page is a trip. The company logo comes from DesignEvo Free Logo Maker — it’s their “3D Orange Letter N” logo. You can see every penny of the twenty-five cents they spent on this. [North Dimension home page, archive; product page, archive; about page, archive; DesignEvo]

Tether and Deltec

When Tether became a Deltec customer in November 2018, it deposited about $1.8 billion — making up nearly half of Deltec’s total deposits at the time.

Alameda was the second-largest creator of tethers (USDT) — “about one-third of USDT minted at any time went to Alameda.”

The USDT was funded with FTX customer deposits which Deltec routed to Alameda. Remember that Alameda and FTX were claiming at this time to be completely separate operationally.

Alameda created and redeemed tethers directly via Alameda and Tether’s Deltec accounts. Alameda would first send a message to the Alameda/Tether/Deltec group chat. Transfers would often have to wait for Pepin to be awake.

Alameda pumping out new tethers seems to have been the engine for the billions of tethers printed in 2020, 100 million at a time: “In total, Alameda minted more than $40 billion USDT through this scheme, encompassing nearly half of USDT in circulation at the time.”

How solidly backed was USDT by the account at Deltec? About as solidly as it was in 2017 when Tether didn’t have a bank account at all for months at a time:

… in November 2018, Deltec Bank provided an assurance letter stating that USDTs were fully back by cash, one U.S. dollar for every USDT. However, the next day, Tether began to transfer hundreds of millions in funds out of its Deltec Bank account, such that within 24 hours, Deltec Bank’s assurance letter was no longer true.

FTX’s alleged Tether scam

The complaint postulates that Alameda was furiously printing tethers so that Alameda could make less than a tenth of a percent from arbitraging the price of USDT:

Upon information and belief, Alameda and Tether profited from the scheme as follows. Alameda would create USDT in amounts and at times that would inflate the market price of the stablecoin. Alameda would promptly sell the USDT in the market, at several basis points above the purchase price. Tether, in turn, would receive U.S. dollars for stablecoins it minted from nothing.

This sounds unlikely to us — there just isn’t the volume on any existing USD-USDT trading pair. To turn USDT into dollars in any quantity, you need to buy crypto then sell that at an actual-dollar exchange.

Deltec allowed Alameda a three-day grace period to pay for its freshly created USDT — that $1.8 billion line of credit. We think Alameda’s scam would have been to do some market-moving trades to make enough dollars to pay for the tethers they’d just bought.

Attachments to the complaint

Also attached to the complaint is a declaration from Caroline Ellison, former head of Alameda. Ellison apparently settled with this class action’s plaintiffs in January 2024 and offered to assist them. This declaration asserts the accuracy of the claims in the complaint as far as Ellison directly knows.

FTX former counsel Dan Friedberg adds a declaration. Friedberg has also settled with the plaintiffs of this class action. He only confirms the plaintiffs’ claim that Avinash Dabir managed FTX’s celebrity sponsorships out of FTX’s Miami office.

The last attachment on the amended complaint is a transcript of a podcast with Dabir talking to Joe Pompliano on the Joe Pomp Show about FTX’s celebrity sponsorships.

Harborne corrects the record by lawsuit

Christopher Harborne, shareholder of 12% of the Tether empire under his Thai name, Chakrit Sakunkrit, is suing the Wall Street Journal for an article it wrote in March 2023. The story was about Tether’s efforts to get banking after they were cut off by correspondent bank Wells Fargo in 2017. [Complaint, PDF, archive]

The WSJ story said that Harborne aided Tether’s efforts to skirt the traditional banking system by using his company AML Global to set up an account at Signature Bank: “The Sakunkrit name had earlier been added to a list of names the bank felt were trying to evade anti-money-laundering controls when the companies’ earlier accounts were closed, but Mr. Harborne’s hadn’t.”

Harborne states that “AML’s Signature Bank account was never used for Tether or Bitfinex whatsoever.” WSJ told him that the story didn’t imply that he had committed crimes, but he is suing over a claimed inference that he had.

WSJ edited the story on February 21 to remove the bits about Harborne. [WSJ; archive of March 3, 2023]

Harborne’s lawyers also reached out to Mike Burgersburg, a.k.a. Dirty Bubble Media, asking him to take down his article on Harborne. Mike kept the story up but made edits. [Dirty Bubble, archive of November 30, 2023]

Originally Mike had noted that the account Harborne set up at Signature was a back door for Bitfinex to access the US banking system. His source was the WSJ. “This was edited because WSJ removed those comments from their story. I am not making this claim, and there is no evidence at present for this assertion,” Mike said. 

Tether is run by a handful of people, some known and many unknown. Former CTO Paolo Ardoino is the named CEO and he acts like a social media intern. This reeks of Ardoino being the fall guy for whoever actually is running Tether.

Harborne doesn’t want to be thought to be that person. He says he “is not now and never has been in any management or executive role at Bitfinex or Tether; he is merely a minority shareholder.” A large chunk of his net worth is apparently in ether. His son, Will Harborne, has worked for various iFinex entities over the years.

Squeal!

Pig butchering scams, a.k.a. romance scams, have taken $75 billion from victims, according to a study by University of Texas finance professor John Griffin and his student Kevin Mei.

Once scammers collect the funds, they most often convert them to tethers: “Funds exit the crypto network in large quantities, mostly in Tether, through less transparent but large exchanges—Binance, Huobi, and OKX.” [SSRN]

Zeke Faux researched Tether’s pig butchering use case in depth for his book Number Go Up. That chapter of the book was put up by Bloomberg as a teaser. [Bloomberg, 2023, archive]

Griffin has been following Tether for some years. He was behind another paper on Tether money flows, 2018’s “Is Bitcoin Really Un-Tethered.” That study showed how Tether was used to prop up the price of bitcoin for most of the 2017 crypto bubble. 

Tether shills on Twitter have been frantically congratulating Tether on its “deal” with the Department of Justice to combat romance scams. No such deal has been announced. [Twitter, archive]

Just in case

USDT tokens are currently available on 15 different blockchains. Most of the issuance is on Ethereum and Tron.

Tether has proudly announced a recovery tool in case any of these blockchains have problems and your USDT becomes inaccessible. [Tether, archive]

We doubt Tether would make an announcement like this without a gun to their heads. So this reads to us like Tether reassuring the crypto whales that their tethers will be protected if Tron goes down.

Heading for the trillion

Tether crossed 100 billion USDT in circulation on March 5. This is completely in line with Dan Davies’ theory from Lying for Money that frauds snowball over time: 

The reason for this is that unlike a genuine business, a fraud does not generate enough real returns to support itself, particularly as money is extracted by the criminal. Because of this, at every date when repayment is expected, the fraudster has to make the choice between whether to shut the fraud down and try to make an escape, or to increase its size; more and more money has to be defrauded in order to keep the scheme going as time progresses.

The news about crossing 100 billion made it into Reuters, which noted Tether’s remarkably non-transparent reserves and the risks Tether poses to crypto and the broader financial system. [Reuters; Reuters]

Tether needs to be shut down. We’ve been saying this since 2017. It’s a risk to anyone who holds crypto. It’s also helped to accelerate other scams, so they’ve grown to a whole new level. 

As we write this, Tether has just printed 2 billion USDT — its biggest issuance yet. Tether has printed 5 billion new USDT in just the past week. Gotta keep number going up. MOOONNNEEEYYY TTTIIIIMMMMEEEE!

Image: Gregory Pepin photographed on the ipad 11 “ich sell phone.

(Updated March 12 at 5PM ET to add a quote from Mike Burgersburg and clarify why he edited his story on Tether.)

_______________________________________________

And now, a word from our sponsors

We write this newsletter for money. Please send us some! Here’s Amy’s Patreon and here’s David’s. For casual tips, here’s Amy’s Ko-Fi and here’s David’s.

Patrons can get free “Bitcoin: It can’t be that stupid” stickers! Just message one of us with your postal address.

Another way that you can help our work: if you liked this post, tell just one other person. Send them a link! It really helps. Thank you!