• By Amy Castor and David Gerard

We were going to do a quick news update on the world of bitcoin mining —then we got hold of Riot’s 10-K filing for 2023. Hoo boy.

Extreme noise terror

Bitcoin mining in Arkansas is making everyone miserable. The 24/7 noise caused by cooling fans is keeping residents up at night, chasing away wildlife, and lowering property values. 

The Satoshi Action Fund, led by Dennis Porter, is making matters worse for homeowners. The advocacy group, founded by climate denier and former Trump EPA chief of staff Mandy Gunasekara, has been pushing policies that offer greater legal protections for bitcoin miners. [NYT]

In a world where scientists widely hold that the impact of climate change will range from bad to really bad, Gunasekara thinks the impact will be “mild and manageable.” She is unable to come up with any scientific evidence to support this claim. [NPR, 2023

In Hood County, Texas, homeowners living near a Marathon Digital mining facility are equally pissed about the noise and environmental damage wrought by crypto mines. “It’s like sitting on the runway of an airport where jets are taking off, one after another.” [Time; WFAA, archive

The Texas Coalition Against Crypto Mining, led by Jackie Sawicky, is now doing a weekly email newsletter: Proof Of Waste. We’ve been finding it super-useful already. [Issue 1; Issue 2; subscription form]

Bitcoin is a battery of unspecified size

Bitcoin miners really don’t want anyone to know how much power they use. February 23, was the deadline for 82 bitcoin mining companies to cough up details of their energy use to the Energy Information Administration, the statistical arm of the US Department of Energy. The results were to be made public later this year to better inform policymakers about the climate impacts of bitcoin mining.

At the last moment, Riot Platforms and their lobbying arm, Texas Blockchain Council, filed a complaint in Waco, Texas, to delay the deadline. They claimed that the survey was rushed through on an “emergency” basis without a public comment period. The court granted a temporary restraining order on the data collection until a preliminary injunction hearing could be held. [Doc 13, PDF; Semafor]

The EIA reached an agreement with Riot and the Texas Bitcoin Blockchain Council. It will publish a notice on its planned survey and begin collecting public comments over 60 days. The notice will replace the previous survey. [Agreement, PDF]

The Sierra Club filed an amicus brief. “An outcome in this proceeding that prevents EIA from collecting data for months will materially increase the risk of rolling blackouts in extreme weather events or — as in Texas during Winter Storm Uri — cost customers tens of millions of dollars in payments to cryptocurrency miners to keep their lights on.” [Press release; Amicus brief, PDF

As far as we presently know, bitcoin mining in the US consumes as much energy as the state of Utah.

Climate change is an emergency. In return for all the misery and destruction they bring, bitcoin miners contribute zero to their communities.   

A history of flawless repute 

Riot is the largest crypto mining company in the US with facilities in Rockdale and Corsicana, Texas. It trades publicly on the Nasdaq with the ticker symbol RIOT.

Riot used to be a failing biotech under various names — Aspen Biopharma, Venaxis, Bioptix — whose stock traded under $5. In October 2017, in the heat of a crypto bubble, CEO John O’Rourke and Florida businessman Barry Honig figured out a way to pump the stock: blockchain!

The company rebranded as Riot Blockchain and BIOP became RIOT. The stock shot up from $5 to $46 in a matter of months. Fortunately, O’Rourke and Honig were well-invested!

They picked a good time to divest, too. In December 2017, after Riot’s stock hit a high of $46.80 — coinciding with the peak of the 2017 bitcoin bubble — O’Rourke dumped 30,383 shares for over $800,000. Honig dumped 500,000 shares for an undisclosed amount. 

The SEC was not happy with companies adding “blockchain” to their names without any blockchain business. So Riot bought a two-week-old company called Karios, paying more than $11 million for mining equipment worth only $2 million. Honig just happened to be a shareholder of Karios as well.  

Riot also acquired a majority stake in a “blockchain development company” called Tess based in Ontario, Canada. Tess was a shell company associated with bitcoin phishing sites, including a fake Mt Gox website. 

O’Rourke’s stint as Riot CEO was short-lived. He stepped down in 2018, after he, Honig, and a fellow called Mark Groussman were named in a penny stock scam involving three companies. (Riot was not mentioned in the complaint.) Honig was the alleged “primary strategist.” 

In 2018, short-seller Hindenburg advised investors to steer clear of RIOT and said the company was “hurtling toward the abyss.” An investigative piece by CNBC in February 2018 saw RIOT shares drop 33%. The CNBC report is comedy gold. [Hindenburg; CNBC; YouTube]

RIOT 2023 10-K: Extreme accounting

Riot has filed its full-year financials for 2023. The company reported “all-time highs of $281 million in total revenues, 6,626 Bitcoin produced, and $71 million in power credits earned.” [Press release; 10-K]

The company had no analyst call. This is not at all usual. But it’s not illegal! 

As always, Riot made no profit. The company posted a net loss of $49.5 million in 2023. It’s hard to compare this to their net loss of $509.6 million in 2022 — a large part of that number was goodwill write-offs and bitcoin and mining rig value impairment. 

RIOT reduced its losses on the books by $184.7 million by booking the rise in bitcoin price — that is, capital gains on the bitcoins they are holding, and not any sort of actual income — as “cash on hand, earned.”

Their “selling, general and administrative expenses” — mostly payroll — for 2023 totaled $100.3 million. That’s up $32.9 million from 2022.

Riot’s entire bitcoin mining revenue in 2023 was $189 million — only 2% higher than in 2021. Of that mining revenue, $71 million is subsidies from Texas for not mining bitcoin. That’s ordinary citizens paying to keep this company afloat.

Riot changed its name from “Riot Blockchain” to “Riot Platforms” in January 2023,  hoping to diversify into anything that wasn’t bitcoin mining — such as using its supposed expertise in running large data centers. Nobody cared — almost all Riot’s revenue came from mining. Or from not mining.

Adding water to soup

Bitcoin miner accounting is very special, as we covered a couple of years ago.

The scheme is for the executives to leverage being a public company in a bubble to pay themselves money — e.g., as company shares that the C-suite prints and awards to themselves. The suckers are naïve institutional investors who want in on a bubble. The rug pull is when they go bankrupt.

Money comes into Riot from investors who should know better, and it goes out to insiders and operating expenses. This generates a small stream of income — which relies on past spending on mining rigs and the physical plant.

Riot pays its executives well beyond the company’s carrying capacity. Riot CEO Jason Les is getting $21.5 million a year, mainly in bonuses and stock. Executives awarded themselves another $213.6 million in stock and options as of January 2024 — but it’s performance-based! They’re really efficient at setting money on fire.

The company has a history of diluting stock. They’ve gone from 15 million shares in 2019 to 250 million shares in 2024. In 2023, the company netted $517.6 million from selling 45.8 million new shares. [Ycharts]

One of Riot’s big problems is that even the institutional investors who thought RIOT was a way to get bitcoin exposure have ETFs now instead.

Risk factors

Riot has been telling folks in Navarro County, where it’s building a massive one-gigawatt mining facility, that its servers will be immersion-cooled with oil to reduce noise pollution. A demonstration facility seriously impressed Navarro County commissioners with how quiet it was.

But in the 10-K, Riot admits they have no idea if immersion cooling will even work at scale: 

Immersion-cooling is an emerging technology in Bitcoin mining, which is not in widespread use, and has yet to be deployed at this scale. As such, there is a risk we may not succeed in deploying immersion cooling at such a large scale to achieve sufficient cooling performance. All Bitcoin mining infrastructure, including immersion-cooling and air-cooling, is an evolving study.

The company also admits they’re absolutely screwed without the power subsidies from the state of Texas:

… our plans and strategic initiatives for the Rockdale Facility and Corsicana Facility are based, in part, on our understanding of current environmental and energy regulations, policies, and initiatives enacted by federal and Texas regulators. If new regulations are imposed, or if existing regulations are modified, the assumptions we made underlying our plans and strategic initiatives may be inaccurate, and we may incur additional costs to adapt our planned business, if we are able to adapt at all, to such regulations.

From the extreme bingo hall

Denton in Texas used to have Core Scientific, who went bankrupt in late 2022 to the cheers of the townsfolk — but now the city is welcoming more of these bozos. The miner, whoever it is, appears to be pitching itself to the town as a “modular data center.”  [DRC, archive; DRC, archive]

This is the latest swindle we’re seeing from miners — they pitch themselves as “high-speed computing” or “modular data centers,” as if they could use their computing power for something other than mining. They can’t. ASICs are specialized and run for about eighteen months before becoming e-waste.

Jaime Leverton, the CEO of bitcoin miner Hut 8, has stepped down after that short-seller report from J Capital we mentioned previously. Her resignation sent the stock (Nasdaq: HUT) down 8%. Leverton is succeeded by President Asher Genoot. [CoinDesk

Analysts for the Bitfinex crypto exchange say that miners are dumping their bitcoins ahead of the halving. We think this means the miners are desperate for cash, they don’t think the current pump in price will hold, or they’re getting ready to exit the business. [Bitfinex, archive

Ethiopia is suffering a plague of crypto miners, lured by cheap energy. A wave of Chinese miners brought their container data centers to the country after they were kicked out of China in 2021. Several Chinese companies have now invested in a $4.8 billion dam, which the miners would draw power from. Ethiopia has signed a preliminary agreement to establish a $250 million bitcoin mining and AI (apparently) data center, led by the Russian bitcoin miner BitCluster. While all this is going on, about 40% of Ethiopia’s population of 120 million have no electricity. [South China Morning Post, archive; Bloomberg, archive

We hear tell that the bitcoin mining rigs in El Salvador, which President Bukele set up outside the LaGeo plant in Berlín, Usulután, are no longer running, which is unsurprising in a country where power is 15c-20c/kWh — the container mining rig data centers have been left rusting in the sun. There are rumors that much of the setup has been stripped for scrap metal. We look forward to the rest of bitcoin mining going the same way.

Bingo masters break out

Bitcoin miners in the US don’t run on the naïve model of making bitcoins and selling them — they’re creatures of fabulously questionable financial engineering in public markets. And with leverage comes weirdness.

These companies are in an unprofitable business. The only ones making money are the executives, who treat company stock like their personal ATM. 

We expect the US miners to finally admit they’re broke at some point soon — hopefully this year. Apart from mining income halving in a couple of months, the bitcoin price can’t be pumped with billions of tethers forever — ultimately, the retail dollars just aren’t there.

Bitcoin miners could be saved with another crypto bubble.  Any moment now! We don’t think a fresh bubble will kick off this year — it would require a fresh influx of retail dollars that just aren’t in evidence — but we don’t want to bet against human foolishness.

When the companies go bankrupt, the shareholders will end up holding the bag. It’s hard to feel that sorry for them — most of these were institutional investors who really should have known better.

States like Texas will be left figuring out what to do with the mountains of e-waste they leave behind.

5 thoughts on “Bitcoin mining: Riot Platforms’ 10-K is full of tentacles

  1. I agree. Let’s not bet against human foolishness. The only real use case for crypto is ‘get rich quick’ – and who doesn’t want that? If only it would work though.

    Thanks for your outstanding writing!

  2. This is great reporting — but… I’ll offer just one clean up (as both a lawyer and accounting expert), on Riot’s late 2023 adoption of ASU No. 2023-08:

    The company actually treats the unrealized increases as credits against operating expenses, not “capital gains” (picky, I know). But it is indeed a small matter, because when (not if) Bitcoin next swoons, Riot will be required to report that UNREALIZED decline as ADDED expenses of operations, on its P&L.

    As of the end of 2023, it stopped “housing” the mined Bitcoin on the balance sheet — as an investment (and marking that investment to market, quarterly).

    I think this may be the only ’34 Act company group (Bitcoin miners) where it is even possible, under GAAP, to treat Bitcoin as money – when you haven’t actually turned them into US dollars (as effectively “income” — against operating expenses) simply by saying so.

    ASU No. 2023-08: it is a fools’ tool.

    For it will bite twice as hard (when Bitcoin declines) as it kissed, while the coin was rising.

    See here: https://wp.me/p9vCT3-7zE

    D A M N.

    All in all — great work!

  3. Semi related

    I feel like England’s self reflected view of its former glory is sung to the tune of Coldplay when in reality it sounded a lot more like Extreme Noise Terror to the rest of us.

  4. So now that I read this, I am curious about Cleanspark inc ( CLSK). I have seen their top executives getting paid Exuberant amounts of money for basically doing nothing.

    Their top executives have been selling company shares when Cleanspark hit record highs as well, which seemed strange for a fairly new operation that used to do some kind of business with Windmills.

    They seem to be surviving from their Supposed Bitcoins that they have mined to date selling a few here and there to what looks like IMO pay the bills.

    I would very much welcome a reply to this if there’s any information regarding Cleanspark. I just wonder if this is another scam?

Leave a Reply