Société Générale’s useless euro stablecoin: when bank blockchain units go feral

  • By Amy Castor and David Gerard

  • Help our work: if you liked this post, tell just one other person. It really helps, especially since Twitter’s so bad now.
  • You can also send us money! Here’s Amy’s Patreon and here’s David’s. For casual tips, here’s Amy’s Ko-Fi and here’s David’s.

Société Générale’s euro-backed stablecoin, EUR CoinVertible (EURCV), has been listed on the Bitstamp exchange in Luxembourg!

This is the first stablecoin issued by a bank! If you stretch the word “first” and the word “stablecoin.”

EURCV is as useful as every other enterprise blockchain scheme — it doesn’t do anything, but you can market it with ancient bitcoin slogans with a different buzzword in them.

EUR CoinVertible: what it is

Société Générale (SocGen) is France’s third largest bank. SocGen Forge is their experimental blockchain unit, founded in 2018.

Jean-Marc Stenger, chief executive of SocGen Forge, promoted EUR CoinVertible to the Financial Times by talking about the huge US dollar domination of the stablecoin market — meaning Tether and USDC. [FT, archive]

Here’s the EUR CoinVertible white paper. [SocGen Forge, PDF]

SocGen has big ambitions for EURCV:

… we want our solution to be widely available through major Digital Asset exchanges to offer market participants a robust alternative for their needs. We also hope to see our solution used as a quality asset for various on-chain transactions (collateral, margining, wrapping to another blockchain etc.).

The trouble is that SocGen can do hardly any of these fancy DeFi tricks — because they can’t get away with setting up a money-laundering coin.

How EUR CoinVertible works, or not

EUR CoinVertible is “open to anyone who wants to use it, either operations on our own platform or other platforms,” Stenger told FT. This is only true in the sense of “anyone” who’s signed up with SocGen as an authorized user of the token.

EURCV will be issued on the public Ethereum blockchain as an ordinary ERC20 token. But you will only be able to move tokens if you’re whitelisted with SocGen as an authorized customer. Only “qualified investors” under French law — analogous to “sophisticated investors” in the UK or “accredited investors” in the US — can become EURCV customers.

So you can trade EURCV on Bitstamp against EUR and USDT — but you can’t move it off again unless you’re a fully qualified and KYCed customer of SocGen. [Bitstamp, archive]

Functionally, EURCV is a zero-interest bank account with SocGen — but less flexible.

EURCV is so locked down that we can’t even think of a way to use it for scamming.

Why would you even do this?

SocGen Forge has produced multiple blockchain products. Very few of these have more than pilot usage. That doesn’t matter, because the project existing at all matters much more than whether it’s of the slightest use. [Forge]

Banks want to chase the crypto buck — they think it’s cheap, free money from morons. This is true, but only if you break as many laws as crypto does.

Banks can’t really do that — so they end up creating things that don’t work for the crypto guys and also don’t work for conventional finance.

The potential is incredible, of course. Just imagine the hypothetical wins!

Banks were worried that a new wave of fintech startups — online banking, mobile lending, etcetera — were going to steal business from them. So in the mid-2010s, they formed fintech innovation teams.

Those bank innovation teams have to justify their existence. Sometimes they come up with something useful! But usually they just go with blockchain. We hear it’s the future of money.

Bank blockchain teams tend to coalesce around a few hardcore coiners who see it as their sacred mission to evangelize the good news about crypto. Anyone who isn’t a hardcore coiner moves elsewhere, to spend their life on something less futile.

The only reason to put EURCV on the public Ethereum chain is so that SocGen can say they’re doing a public stablecoin.

For similar reasons, SocGen Forge did an 11 million EUR “green bond” on Ethereum in November. It’s got all the finely permissioned and documented legal requirements of any other bond — but it’s also on Ethereum, for no functional reason. [Press release]

The attraction for SocGen is to claim it’s bringing “tech” to France, and it doesn’t matter if the tech is incoherent trash.

The Byzantine Manager Problem

Bank culture is about minimizing risk. So banks are terrible at innovation. Issuing a “stablecoin” is easier than being in any way actually innovative.

There are also many in the financial sector who want things to stay just as they are: lack of transparency, bad systems, no competition.

And there’s no better way to keep things the same than to invest in “innovation” that can’t work.

Blockchain is the perfect solution to this Byzantine Manager Problem:

  1. Imagine a group of senior Byzantine managers who need to implement a new system.


  2. If managers do not support any ideas, they will be fired for failing to show leadership.


  3. Anyone supporting a strategy for implementing the new system knows that if it fails, the other managers who did not support the idea will unite to blame them and crush them.

  4. All the managers know that none of them are capable of predicting what will work.


  5. If managers do not support an idea that subsequently succeeds, the supporters of the successful idea will drive them out of the organization for failing to support them.

  1.  The solution is to find an idea that is guaranteed not to work, i.e., blockchain. Every manager can support the strategy because guaranteed failure means everyone can show leadership with no chance of another faction blaming them for failure or lack of support.

Images: Teodor Kreczmar-Schuldorff

Other bank stablecoin tokens

The current favored euphemism for bank stablecoins is “tokenized deposits.”

Tokenized deposits represent traditional bank deposits — e.g., J.P. Morgan’s JPMCoin is a token traded on a private Ethereum instance they run in-house, and only JPMCoin customers can access it. This sounds pointless because it is.

Citibank has Citi Token Services. This doesn’t do anything. But it could and it has potential! Citi did a test transaction with Maersk. [Bankingdive; Citigroup; Bloomberg, archive]

ANZ Bank in Australia issued a tokenized deposit in 2022. It did two test transactions!

The crypto world has TassatPay, the successor to Silvergate Exchange Network and SIGnet, for internal settlement between US crypto companies. Somehow the banks involved don’t talk this one up so much.

When you read a puff piece that talks about companies doing a real, genuine single blockchain transaction, it means the two companies’ blockchain innovation units are both trying to justify their existence.

SocGen’s innovation is to put their useless private altcoin on a public blockchain — but they have to maintain the same level of absolute control as with anything else that touches real money to keep the crooks out, or the regulators will be deeply unhappy with them.

You might think that all of this sounds completely pointless, and you must just be missing the subtle reasons why it’s actually very clever and useful. We would just tap the sign again:

News: MicroStrategy needs more cowbell, Tether surpasses $34B, those laser eyes, Tether collapse doomsday scenario

I nearly ventured to Austin Wednesday, but my flight was canceled due to the storm, havoc, and general disaster in the area. I found another flight later in the day and was headed out the door, when I thought, nah. Turned out to be a good decision, since I probably wouldn’t have survived more than a day without wifi.

Last week, Tether issued another 2.2 billion tethers, so you can buy bitcoin with real cash at a higher price. As of today, Feb. 21, there are now $34 billion worth of tethers in circulation—all backed by Tether’s good word. Oh, and they just printed another 800 million this morning.

More lulz for Mr. Musk—this time a double entendre.

Bitcoin is over $57,000. Why? Because it is a Ponzi scheme, and people who put their money into a Ponzi or MLM scheme get excited when numbers go up because they think they are getting hilariously rich. When bitcoin reached $1 trillion market cap earlier this week, it was an occasion for celebration in the bitcoin world. All of the bitcoiners on Twitter gave themselves laser eyes—in the hopes of pushing bitcoin to $100,000—and posted pictures of raw, juicy steaks.

Market cap, as I have explained, is a delusional number when it comes to crypto. A trillion-dollar market cap assumes everyone who owns bitcoin bought it for $55,000 and could sell it for that. That is nowhere near the truth. Many bitcoiners bought bitcoin for a fraction of what it is today. And if everyone sold at once, the market would collapse. It’s all fantasy.

My weekly reminder that I have a Patreon account. Thank you to my new patrons, who pushed me up over $600 last week. You can subscribe for as little as $5 a month. It’s like buying me a beer or a latte every four weeks.

Okay, let’s talk about bitcoin’s newest crazy god, who also has laser eyes on his Twitter profile.

MicroStrategy: More cowbell

Every single day, MicroStrategy chief Michael Saylor is on Twitter—or elsewhere—shilling bitcoin. This has literally been his new day job since he staked the future of his entire company and his reputation on “number go up.” His tweets are bizarre and often make no sense. Lately, he has been taking random quotes from famous people and attributing them to bitcoin.

In his latest move, Saylor has taken MicroStrategy deeper down the debt hole. Last week, the company sold $1.05 billion in convertible senior notes, which it plans to invest in more bitcoin. The notes mature in February 2027. (Decrypt, MicroStrategy PR)

This is on top of the firm’s $650 million bond offering in December, which MicroStrategy also used to buy bitcoin. Those notes mature in December 2025. The company owns 72,000 bitcoin per a February regulatory filing. And don’t forget, Saylor has his own personal stash of bitcoin, though we don’t know how much he still has—or if he was selling when MicroStrategy was buying.

If the price of bitcoin collapses, MicroStrategy could literally go bankrupt. But remember, Saylor owns 70% of the company’s voting stock, so he calls the shots. The other MicroStrategy board members can only sit back and watch in horror.

Big companies buying bitcoin and putting them into cold storage means more bitcoin getting pulled out of circulation so that the already small supply of circulating bitcoin grows smaller and the market becomes easier for whales to manipulate—even if those whales bought their hoards of BTC via alias accounts funded with tethers.

So what if MicroStrategy puts another $1 billion into bitcoin and Tesla buys $1.5 billion worth? Tether issues that much fake money in a week. Meanwhile, all the real cash in bitcoin goes out the door as miners sell their 900 newly-minted bitcoin per day for fiat. Bitcoin itself generates no revenue. It’s simply investor money going in one end and out the other.

Jorge Stolfi, a Brazilian computer scientist, estimates that the accumulative amount that bitcoin investors have lost so far is at least $15 billion. When you invest in bitcoin, you immediately lose money, just like all those who invested in Bernie Madoff’s fund, though they went on for years thinking they were making money.

NYAG / Bitfinex—status update

We should be hearing something soon on the New York attorney general’s investigation into Bitfinex/Tether, but probably nothing big, or earth moving—not yet at least.

Bitfinex’s law firm Steptoe filed a letter on Jan. 19, saying Bitfinex/Tether needed more time to send in their documents. Here is what they said exactly: “We will plan to next contact the Court in approximately 30 days to either provide a final status update or to schedule a conference with the Court to discuss any open items.”

The office of the attorney general still has to take a position on the material it receives, and Bitfinex boasted that it had spammed them with some 2.5 million documents. My guess is that Bitfinex, like failed Canadian crypto exchange QuadrigaCX, hasn’t kept accurate records of their financial dealings and they are flying by the seat of their pants. Quadriga operator Gerald Cotten kept no books, commingled funds, and viewed customer money as his personal slush fund.

Tether doomsday scenario

Some people—Nouriel Roubini in particular—have predicted that Tether will get taken down this year, though it will take a much larger effort than the NY AG alone. Still, what will happen if Tether’s operators are arrested and its bank accounts seized? If Tether collapses, we may see something like the following unfold:

  • Panic ensues on offshore exchanges, like Binance and Huobi, as traders begin dumping USDT and buying up BTC at any price.
  • The price of BTC on banked vs. unbanked exchanges begins to diverge. BTC goes up on unbanked exchanges and drops on banked exchanges, like Coinbase, as people start selling their BTC for cash en masse.
  • Banked exchanges face liquidity crises as they can’t keep up with withdrawals. We start to see system outages and paused trading—similar to what happened with Robinhood on Jan. 28.
  • The price of BTC collapses to the point where bitcoin miners cannot pay their monstrous power bills.
  • At some point, the bitcoin hash rate will drop, and bitcoin will go into a death spiral. When miners can’t pay their electric bills, they unplug from the network. This leaves bitcoin vulnerable to attacks, and the virtual currency becomes worthless.

Mind you, bitcoin will never die off completely. Unlike other Ponzi schemes, which disappear when they collapse, bitcoin will spring back to life from time to time. This is the fourth—and by far the biggest—bitcoin bubble since 2009.

Bitcoin’s sick energy consumption

After Tesla announced it bought 1.5 billion worth of BTC, bitcoin’s grotesque energy consumption has come under fire. Based on some estimates, the network consumes as much energy as the entire country of Argentina with 45 million people. Christmas lights are literally a more productive use of electricity to bring joy to people’s lives than bitcoin. (This is a joke. In 2018, bitcoiners claimed that Christmas lights consumed more energy than bitcoin.)

Bitcoiners like to argue this is all green energy, but that is simply not true. Two-thirds of bitcoin mining is based in China, a country that relies heavily on coal-fired electricity. Some miners in the Sichuan province get power from hydro, but only during the wet season. The rest of the time, they turn to fossil fuels. (My blog)

And for those still claiming bitcoin uses clean energy, Trolly had a few more points to add: 

  • The Three Gorges Dam—a gargantuan structure straddling the Yangtze River in China’s Hubei province—has long been criticized for its environmental impact and displacement of two million people. The dam generated a record 112 terawatt hours of electricity in 2020. According to Digiconomist, bitcoin consumes 79 TWh of electricity per year—more than half that.
  • You need one million Bitmain’s Antminer 19s Pros to reach the current bitcoin hashrate of 110M TH/s. That means there are at least one million nodes on the bitcoin network—more if miners are using Bitmain’s outdated S17 model. These machines are good for two years max before they get tossed into landfills and replaced with more efficient ASIC rigs.
  • Bitcoin processes 300,000 transactions per day. The all-in cost of a single bitcoin transaction is $20 for infrastructure and $40 for electricity. Miners currently break even when the BTC price is $20,000. (That’s based on energy and other costs.)

Coinbase behind Tesla’s BTC purchase

Coinbase facilitated Tesla’s recent $1.5 billion purchase of bitcoin, according to The Block. An unidentified source told the outlet that the San Francisco-based crypto exchange made the purchase on behalf of Tesla over the course of several days in early February. The price of BTC in the first week of Feb. was around $38,000.

Similar to how it helped MicroStrategy make its big BTC purchase, Coinbase broke up Tesla’s order into small pieces and routed those to over-the-counter trading desks to minimize the impact on the overall bitcoin market.**

Coinbase wrote up a case study on how it bought bitcoin for MicroStrategy.

Motley Fool’s ship of fools

Another ship of fools has headed off to sea.

The Motley Fool is a private financial and investing advice company based in Alexandria, Virginia. It’s been around since 1993, so you would think they actually do their due diligence. Apparently not. Also, regular folks rely on them for sage investment advice, which is why I was shocked to learn Motley Fool was putting $5 million into bitcoin. (Fool announcement)

Motley Fool justified the investment with these three reasons:

  1. We believe it will store value more effectively than gold over the long term.
  2. We believe it may become a medium for transactions, as/if pricing stabilizes in the decade ahead.
  3. We believe it can act as a productive hedge against inflation.

All three reasons are blitheringly stupid. Medium for transactions? If the price stabilizes in the future? Name one time in the past decade where the price of bitcoin has stabilized. As I explained earlier, the more people who hodl bitcoin, the less stable it becomes. It will never be a stable asset. And you can’t call bitcoin a “store of value” if you get only 20% of what you paid for it.

At least one sensible Motley Fool contributor explained why investing in bitcoin is a horrible idea.

GameStop hearing #1

I spent two hours on Thursday watching the first half of a five-hour GameStop House Financial Services Committee hearing. Most of the questions were not that interesting. This is the first of three hearings. I’m not sure I can watch anymore, unless someone from the SEC, such as Gary Gensler, joins in on the questioning.

The nut is that Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev apologized to his users for stopping customer trading during the peak of the madness, but says he wasn’t colluding with hedge funds. “We don’t answer to hedge funds,” he said. “We serve the millions of small investors who use our platform every day to invest.” (NPR)

He also would not admit there was a liquidity problem when he limited trades in January.

David Portnoy doesn’t like Vlad’s hair. He thinks it makes him look untrustworthy.

And Keith Gill (Roaring Kitty), who made $48 million from a $53,000 investment in GameStop, came off as a likable, honest guy. Although, he may need those profits to defend himself against at least one proposed class-action. (Complaint)

Other newsy bits

Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) added laser eyes to her Twitter profile pic, confounding the political press and turning bitcoiners into a bunch of cooing babies (Slate)

A few years ago, the SEC shut down the entirely fraudulent ICO market. A sudden shutdown of the DeFi money market (DMM) may be the start of the next regulatory wave. (David Gerard)

The U.S. Treasury Department accused crypto payments platform BitPay of facilitating over 2,100 transactions with individuals in sanctioned nations. BitPay will pay $500,000 to settle the charges. (Coindesk, enforcement notice)

JP Morgan calls Tether an unbacked wildcat bank. “A sudden loss of confidence in USDT would likely generate a severe liquidity shock to Bitcoin markets, which could lose access to by far the largest pools of demand and liquidity,” analysts said. (Bloomberg)

FTX, one of Tether’s biggest customers, claims on Twitter that its volume and customer numbers are real. All you need is an email to set up an account—no KYC for tier 0, 1 accounts with up to $9,000 USD daily withdrawal,* which means anyone can set up any number of alias accounts. Trading volume is a meaningless number due to robot trading and probably wash trading.

Stephen Diehl on Bitcoin mining: “The Crypto Chernobyl.” (blog post)

BitMEX’s Arthur Hayes—who was indicted in October and is still at large—has resurfaced to argue the Robinhood shutdown was orchestrated by financial elites. This is a sign that retail investors should buy crypto, he said. (Cointelegraph) (Tweet)

*Updated to note FTX has no KYC on both tier 0, 1 accounts. In an earlier version of this newsletter, I said you did not need KYC to withdraw up to $1,000. But it’s actually up to $9,000 per day for high-volume accounts.

**Updated March 2: An earlier version of this story incorrectly stated that Coinbase routed the Tesla order to OTC desks, so as not to “crash” the price of BTC. This is incorrect. A large order would lift the market. Story has been altered to reflect that.

Feature image: Ship of fools depicted in a 1549 German woodcut